Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Friday November 24 2017, @06:55PM   Printer-friendly
from the beary-important-news dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

A boatload of tourists in the far eastern Russian Arctic thought they were seeing clumps of ice on the shore, before the jaw-dropping realisation that some 200 polar bears were roaming on the mountain slope.

"It was a completely unique situation," said Alexander Gruzdev, director of the Wrangel Island nature reserve where the encounter in September happened. "We were all gobsmacked, to be honest."

The bears had come to feast on the carcass of a bowhead whale that washed ashore, later resting around the food source. The crowd included many families, including two mothers trailed by a rare four cubs each, Gruzdev told AFP.

Climate change means ice, where polar bears are most at home, is melting earlier in the year and so polar bears have to spend longer on land, scientists say.

This might wow tourists but means the bears, more crammed together on coasts and islands, will eventually face greater competition for the little food there is on land.

Locals are also at risk from hungry animals venturing into villages.

Wrangel Island, off the coast of Russia's Chukotka in the northeast, is where polar bears rest after ice melts in early-August until November, when they can leave land to hunt for seals.

It is also considered the birthing centre for the species, with the highest density of maternity dens in the entire Arctic, Gruzdev said.

"A whale is a real gift for them," he said. "An adult whale is several tens of tonnes" that many bears can feed on for several months.

Studies have shown that, compared with 20 years ago, polar bears now spend on average a month longer on Wrangel Island because "ice is melting earlier and the ice-free period is longer," said Eric Regehr, from the University of Washington, the lead American scientist on the US-Russian collaborative study of Wrangel Island polar bears.

Changing ice conditions could also be responsible for the increasing number of bears flocking there, Regehr said.

This autumn, the number of bears observed was 589, far exceeding previous estimates of 200-300, he said, calling it "anomalously high".

[...] "We cannot stop climate change, but we can sort out the situation on the shore and make life easier for the bears," he said, referring to measures such as bear patrols to minimise conflict with humans.

"With changes in nature, that has to be attended to."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by bradley13 on Saturday November 25 2017, @07:29AM (4 children)

    by bradley13 (3053) on Saturday November 25 2017, @07:29AM (#601292) Homepage Journal

    Of course, the alarmists ignore any inconvenient facts, like the increase in the polar bear population over the past 15 years [polarbearscience.com].

    As for how "crowded" the poor polar bears are: There are around 30,000 of them, in all of the arctic (Greenland + Russia + Canada + ice cap). The amazing thing is that 200 of them manage to gather to eat a whale corpse.

    --
    Everyone is somebody else's weirdo.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=1, Informative=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by t-3 on Saturday November 25 2017, @01:11PM (1 child)

    by t-3 (4907) on Saturday November 25 2017, @01:11PM (#601365)

    Yeah, bears are one of the last species I'd worry about, as long as hunting is kept in check and ample environment is set aside. They're some of the most intelligent, adaptable, and tough animals on the planet.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 25 2017, @02:56PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 25 2017, @02:56PM (#601396)

      To pick a nit, "bear" (Ursus) isn't a species; it's a genus.
      (Think: black bear, brown bear, grizzly bear, polar bear.)

      FTFS: two mothers trailed by a rare four cubs each

      I recently read something by a grizzly bear conservationist:

      For female grizzlies, being obese is especially critical. The fatter a female is at denning time, the more likely she is to birth larger litters of cubs in late January--perhaps three cubs instead of one. And, larger litters are especially important if populations are threatened as in the lower 48 states. Since cub mortality can be as high as 60% or more, producing larger litters is vital to recovering imperiled populations.

      If a female grizzly is too thin when she enters the den, her body will not produce cubs. While bears breed in early summer, the small embryo or blastocyst of a pregnant female floats around in the uterus for months. In fact, the amount of body fat accumulated by a pregnant female determines whether the blastocyst implants in the uterus–or not--once she dens. If she is in poor condition, the embryo is reabsorbed. If she is in good condition, it implants.

      The main part of the article [counterpunch.org] is about how amazing bear physiology is, with them not peeing or pooping for months.
      There is no "waste"; EVERYTHING gets recycled.

      -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 25 2017, @03:24PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 25 2017, @03:24PM (#601402)

    Global population of polar bears has increased by 2,650 - 5,700 since 2001

    That defies logic.

    Melting Ice Threatens Polar Bears' Survival -- Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution [whoi.edu]

    melting Arctic ice is a critical threat to the bears’ survival. Polar bears need ice as a platform to hunt for their main food source: seals. As the Arctic Ocean became more ice-free over more summer days in 2004 and 2005, polar bear breeding and survival declined below the point needed to maintain the population, the team found.

    The population can withstand occasional “bad-ice years,” but not a steady diet of them.

    Maybe more are being counted because there are more near where humans are--instead of being out on sea ice where they're supposed to be (where the seals are).

    -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]

    • (Score: 2, Touché) by khallow on Saturday November 25 2017, @04:14PM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Saturday November 25 2017, @04:14PM (#601419) Journal

      That defies logic.

      When reality defies the logic, then the logic is wrong.