Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Sunday November 26 2017, @03:12AM   Printer-friendly
from the quantum-leap dept.

https://amosbbatto.wordpress.com/2017/11/21/mozilla-market-share/

When Firefox was introduced in 2004, it was designed to be a lean and optimized web browser, based on the bloated code from the Mozilla Suite. Between 2004 and 2009, many considered Firefox to be the best web browser, since it was faster, more secure, offered tabbed browsing and was more customizable through extensions than Microsoft's Internet Explorer. When Chrome was introduced in 2008, it took many of Firefox's best ideas and improved on them. Since 2010, Chrome has eaten away at Firefox's market share, relegating Firefox to a tiny niche of free software enthusiasts and tinkerers who like the customization of its XUL extensions.

According to StatCounter, Firefox's market share of web browsers has fallen from 31.8% in December 2009 to just 6.1% today. Firefox can take comfort in the fact that it is now virtually tied with its former arch-nemesis, Internet Explorer and its variants. All of Microsoft's browsers only account for 6.2% of current web browsing according to StatCounter. Microsoft has largely been replaced by Google, whose web browsers now controls 56.5% of the market. Even worse, is the fact that the WebKit engine used by Google now represents over 83% of web browsing, so web sites are increasingly focusing on compatibility with just one web engine. While Google and Apple are more supportive of W3C and open standards than Microsoft was in the late 90s, the web is increasingly being monopolized by one web engine and two companies, whose business models are not always based on the best interests of users or their rights.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Yaa101 on Sunday November 26 2017, @12:51PM (1 child)

    by Yaa101 (4091) on Sunday November 26 2017, @12:51PM (#601708)

    While I agree that javascript was and is a mistake, they very well understand their customers.
    They are the ones bringing in the money, you and I are not their customers, since we do not pay for it we are their product.

    --
    No comment...
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by mmarujo on Tuesday November 28 2017, @12:46PM

    by mmarujo (347) on Tuesday November 28 2017, @12:46PM (#602486)

    I agree, us users are not who pays Mozilla's bills, however it is only because Thunderbird (remember then?) took the users side that a lock on IE6 began to break.

    Mozilla's greatest strength was shown there. When a page (web "designer") told it to open a new window, Firefox gave it the middle finger: "Screw you, I'm doing what my user wants me to do!"

    They lost focus on the user and everything else is history.

    No, the user doesn't pay the bills, but who will give Mozilla money when they have no users?