Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Sunday December 03 2017, @10:27AM   Printer-friendly
from the does-this-smell-like-almonds? dept.

After hearing his guilty sentence upheld, convicted war criminal Slobodan Praljak took out a small bottle of poison and drank it. The act of defiance was streamed live to viewers around the world. Praljak died a few hours later:

It happened in the span of a few confused minutes.

Moments after hearing that his 20-year sentence for war crimes had been upheld, Slobodan Praljak defied the admonitions of his judges, declared his innocence a final time — and with eyes wide, as if shocked himself at what he was doing, put a tiny glass to his lips and gulped deeply. "I just drank poison," he exclaimed after lowering the glass. And the presiding judge asked for the curtains to be closed.

The end came quickly. Praljak died within hours Wednesday. But as Dutch authorities open their investigation into the incident at the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, one difficult question promises to persist much longer: How exactly did the former Bosnian Croat general manage to commit suicide in a high-security courtroom in The Hague, Netherlands, and in front of viewers streaming the video live around the world?

There is reason — besides his swift death — to believe Praljak's declaration that he had indeed taken poison.

"There was a preliminary test of the substance in the container and all I can say for now is that there was a chemical substance in that container that can cause death," Dutch prosecutor Marilyn Fikenscher told The Associated Press. That said, the official cause of death will have to wait until an autopsy is completed.

Slobodan Praljak. The poison is thought to have been cyanide.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by jmorris on Sunday December 03 2017, @07:10PM (1 child)

    by jmorris (4844) on Sunday December 03 2017, @07:10PM (#604757)

    So this guy (along with his side) committed the grave sin of defeating the wrong enemy. When you win you don't face a war crimes tribunal, so obviously they lost. Since they defeated what they thought was their enemy it is obvious this assumption was mistaken. From the Wiki page it is clear he did nothing that should be wrong in a sane world. He did nothing no American or British general did not do when needed, back when their countries actually won wars. Their enemy was the International System that desired their deaths at the hand of the Muslims it had taken the side of. They should have been fighting for their independence from the U.N.

    One of his "crimes" was destroying religious institutions. That crime does not even make sense when applied to Islam, which he was fighting. They do not accept the concept of a division between "mosque and state" at all. They don't even consider it wrong to use a mosque as an arms depot, command post, etc. That is entirely a Western notion. And accusing someone who was in a total war for survival against Islam of "persecution on religious ground" is a farce.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   -2  
       Troll=4, Underrated=2, Total=6
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   -1  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 03 2017, @08:45PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 03 2017, @08:45PM (#604788)

    jmorris/Balkans/Ottoman Empire/Janissarie: it all makes sense now. jmorris is a young Christian boy, kidnapped at a very young age, raised to fight the enemies of the Caliphate! Makes almost too much sense, if you know what I mean.