Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Sunday December 03 2017, @09:13PM   Printer-friendly
from the impossible-tasks dept.

Some scientists want to ban glitter, a microplastic that can contribute to contamination of the world's oceans:

It's sparkly, it's festive and some scientists want to see it swept from the face of the Earth.

Glitter should be banned, researcher Trisia Farrelly, a senior lecturer in environment and planning at Massey University in New Zealand, told CBS. The reason? Glitter is made of microplastic, a piece of plastic less than 0.19 inches (5 millimeters) in length. Specifically, glitter is made up of bits of a polymer called polyethylene terephthalate (PET), which goes by the trade name Mylar. And though it comes in all sizes, glitter is typically just a millimeter or so across, Live Science previously reported.

Microplastics make up a major proportion of ocean pollution. A 2014 study in the open-access journal PLOS ONE estimated that there are about 5.25 trillion pieces of plastic weighing a total of 268,940 tons (243,978 metric tons) floating in the world's seas. Microplastics made up 92.4 percent of the total count.

NOAA and Plymouth University pages on microplastics.

Also at NYT and National Geographic.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday December 04 2017, @07:34PM (3 children)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Monday December 04 2017, @07:34PM (#605231)

    Should, but I can already hear the moans: "oh, the good old glitter we used to have would just rinse right off, but this new stuff gets all gooey and sticks to everything..."

    I dated a girl in the 1980s who wore sparkly makeup - I'm just now picturing those shiny little dots jamming up the liver capillaries of some fish, and the fish that eats its corpse, and the fish that eats that corpse... for the next 500 years.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by sjames on Monday December 04 2017, @09:40PM (2 children)

    by sjames (2882) on Monday December 04 2017, @09:40PM (#605315) Journal

    The breakdown actually takes a few months of exposure to the environment. Water won't turn it gummy.

    Just add the glitter to horse feed then tell people you have a rare horn-less unicorn.

    • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday December 04 2017, @10:37PM (1 child)

      by JoeMerchant (3937) on Monday December 04 2017, @10:37PM (#605362)

      Breakdown of the starch based plastics, yes. Breakdown of the current mylar? I'm seeing somewhat believable references to the 350-600 year ranges.

      --
      🌻🌻 [google.com]
      • (Score: 2) by sjames on Tuesday December 05 2017, @03:30AM

        by sjames (2882) on Tuesday December 05 2017, @03:30AM (#605490) Journal

        Yes, I meant of the starch based plastics.