Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday December 08 2017, @08:05AM   Printer-friendly
from the invest-in-sunblock dept.

A new study in Nature [Ed-Abstract only for non-subscribers, but see below.] predicts that climate warming will be 15% greater than previous high estimates have predicted. This new study suggests that humans need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions more than previously expected and more than the Paris Agreement calls for. This study was based on analyzing the earth's "energy budget" (absorption and re-emission of radiation) and inputting that into a number of different climate models.

Also covered in more detail in Phys.org and in the Guardian.

The researchers focused on comparing model projections and observations of the spatial and seasonal patterns of how energy flows from Earth to space. Interestingly, the models that best simulate the recent past of these energy exchanges between the planet and its surroundings tend to project greater-than-average warming in the future.

"Our results suggest that it doesn't make sense to dismiss the most-severe global warming projections based on the fact that climate models are imperfect in their simulation of the current climate," Brown said. "On the contrary, if anything, we are showing that model shortcomings can be used to dismiss the least-severe projections."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 09 2017, @07:48PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 09 2017, @07:48PM (#607766)

    The methane, in turn, is far worse of a greenhouse gas than CO2.

    Is it really? https://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/04/11/methane-the-irrelevant-greenhouse-gas/ [wattsupwiththat.com]
    If you're sure it is, could you explain the physics behind that conviction?

  • (Score: 2) by Thexalon on Wednesday December 13 2017, @08:03PM

    by Thexalon (636) on Wednesday December 13 2017, @08:03PM (#609341)

    Yes, it is [acs.org].

    But you're not going to believe those scientists over at the American Chemical Society - I mean, they're only a bunch of chemists, what could they know about chemistry? So instead, I'm going to direct you to performing a variation of this experiment [carleton.edu], farting into one of the test bottles to supply it with some methane. That way, you don't have to believe those eggheads with PhD's, you can just see for yourself.

    --
    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.