Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday December 08 2017, @10:03PM   Printer-friendly
from the touchy-subject dept.

A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday in favor of a Virginia man who, as a teen, was once ordered by a lower court to be photographed while masturbating in the presence of armed police officers.

That warrant was ostensibly part of an ongoing sexting investigation into the then-teen, Trey Sims, who had exchanged explicit messages with his then-15-year-old girlfriend. Her mother reported the incident to the Manassas City Police Department in January 2014.

Eventually, the detective assigned to the case, David Abbott, obtained a signed warrant to take photographs of Sims' naked body—including "the suspect's erect penis"—so that he could compare them to Sims' explicit messages.

[...] The 4th Circuit ruled that Sims' lawsuit against the estate of the now-deceased officer who had led the sexting investigation, David Abbott, could move forward. "We cannot perceive any circumstance that would justify a police search requiring an individual to masturbate in the presence of others," two of the 4th Circuit judges wrote. "Sexually invasive searches require that the search bear some discernible relationship with safety concerns, suspected hidden contraband, or evidentiary need."

The case will now be sent back down to a federal district court in Alexandria, Virginia.

Source: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/12/forcing-kid-to-masturbate-for-cops-in-sexting-case-was-wrong-court-finds/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 08 2017, @10:58PM (6 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 08 2017, @10:58PM (#607490)

    Back up a bit... Some (not all) cops have/had pre-signed warrants they simply needed to finish filling out themselves. This was reported about 20 years ago.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by sjames on Friday December 08 2017, @11:08PM (2 children)

    by sjames (2882) on Friday December 08 2017, @11:08PM (#607498) Journal

    Any judge that would pre-sign a blank warrant should be removed immediately.

    • (Score: 2) by edIII on Saturday December 09 2017, @02:01AM (1 child)

      by edIII (791) on Saturday December 09 2017, @02:01AM (#607559)

      Um, and jailed right? At what level do the abridgment of civil rights constitute a felony? Or is there a level?

      --
      Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.
      • (Score: 3, Insightful) by sjames on Saturday December 09 2017, @02:19AM

        by sjames (2882) on Saturday December 09 2017, @02:19AM (#607569) Journal

        I would suggest jail, but I wouldn't hold my breath.

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by bob_super on Friday December 08 2017, @11:10PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Friday December 08 2017, @11:10PM (#607499)

    Blank warrant vs Minor assault warrant ... both should get the judge thrown out of a court, preferably through a high window, with optional "Go to jail" mat to cushion the fall.

  • (Score: 5, Funny) by frojack on Saturday December 09 2017, @12:23AM

    by frojack (1554) on Saturday December 09 2017, @12:23AM (#607524) Journal

    This was reported about 20 years ago.

    And the practice was stopped back then. (If it ever actually existed).

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by maxwell demon on Saturday December 09 2017, @12:49PM

    by maxwell demon (1608) on Saturday December 09 2017, @12:49PM (#607684) Journal

    One more reason to hold the judge responsible. Because if judges are held responsible for the content of warrants that bear their signature, then they might reconsider if they really want to pre-sign them.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.