Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday December 12 2017, @08:01PM   Printer-friendly
from the driving-your-education-forward dept.

Lyft will offer its drivers access to tuition discounts and financial aid, starting with online courses offered by Guild Education:

Lyft is unveiling a new education program for drivers, offering access to discounted GED and college courses online. The move is an interesting experiment in the gig economy, where a growing class of workers receive zero benefits from a boss and yet competition for their time is fierce.

[...] Lyft drivers will receive tuition discounts ranging from 5 percent to 20 percent and, according to the company, the average driver working with Guild to earn a degree can save up to $4,220 per year. Drivers can take English as a second language and GED courses, as well as earn an associates, bachelor's or master's degree online in subjects including IT, nursing, social work, occupational therapy and business.

Lyft would not disclose how much the program will cost the company. According to a Lyft survey of drivers to be published next month, 47 percent do not have a college degree. Gabe Cohen, general manager for Lyft in Denver, says internal surveys show that drivers want to earn degrees. This move serves that goal, as well as the startup's business interests. "It is important that drivers feel loyalty to Lyft," Cohen says.

[...] David Weil, dean at Brandeis University's Heller School of Social Policy and Management, is not impressed. Weil, who was in charge of investigating companies that misclassify workers under the Obama administration, describes the move by Lyft as strategic, but not generous. Lyft and Uber are fighting in courts against claims that drivers are employees entitled to benefits like paid sick leave and health care. "The ride-hailing companies can't erase the fact that their business models are having drivers do all sorts of things an employee would do," Weil says. To offer training is "really nice" but it doesn't mean Lyft should "be rewarded by having the other responsibilities removed," he says.

From Lyft's blog post:

Dallas driver Muhammed Chan learned by speaking with passengers from all walks of life that "there is serious demand for cyber security experts in my city." As part of our pilot program earlier this year, Muhammed received support to access financial aid and scholarships through Guild, and began a cybersecurity program earlier this month.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Freeman on Tuesday December 12 2017, @08:37PM (4 children)

    by Freeman (732) on Tuesday December 12 2017, @08:37PM (#608912) Journal

    Pole dancing is a legitimate job. Though, very much not from a conservative stand point and very much a hot topic. I don't support the idea that people should be frequenting such an establishment. I do support the idea that people should be free to make their own choice. It would also be a net positive financially and for the people in the business to legalize prostitution. (Not strictly related to the pole dancing in question, but tangentially.) I'm not sure how I would vote on such a topic as I fear the consequences of legalizing what is definitively against the moral values I hold. I would more likely abstain from such a vote. Your post is rather sexist, even though it's sarcastic. In the same vein, that I don't prefer listening to XYZ Class / Race jokes.

    --
    Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Tuesday December 12 2017, @08:57PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Tuesday December 12 2017, @08:57PM (#608926)

    > Your post is rather sexist

    It might have been a comment on the (former) Uber executives and company culture.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 12 2017, @09:52PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 12 2017, @09:52PM (#608960)

    Uber has proven itself to be a sexist and hostile environment to women, the comment was funny and appropo. And please we don't need a 'miss manners' lecture from someone who has no idea what they are talking about.

    Pole dancing is a legitimate job... I don't support the idea that people should be frequenting such an establishment...

    So in other words, you don't really know if it's a legitimate job or not...

    I don't prefer listening to XYZ Class / Race jokes.

    Well at least we agree on that point.

    • (Score: 2) by Freeman on Thursday December 14 2017, @09:09PM

      by Freeman (732) on Thursday December 14 2017, @09:09PM (#609876) Journal

      I don't live under a rock, so yes, it's a legitimate job. Otherwise, there wouldn't be nude bars. It doesn't matter that I don't support the idea. I'd go with the following definition of legitimate "accordant with law or with established legal forms and requirements" from Merriam-Webster. If you equate my original post with a lecture, perhaps you haven't heard one?

      --
      Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 13 2017, @12:07AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 13 2017, @12:07AM (#609019)

    A Network Penetrator is a real job too. Companies hire those security professionals to attack their security systems to find holes. His joke was not sexists, not racist, and not classist. More men work in IT security and more women work in the sexual entertainment industry. Using truths to tell a joke isn't sexist. Nothing was about race or class either.

    You're the one attacking pole dancers by saying it's immoral to use their services, but so long as no one looks at them it's ok to pay them to do stuff. You are free to follow your own morals whether something is illegal or not. If prostitution was legalized, such an act wouldn't compel you to participate in it. You'd be free to follow your morals and not engage in such services. The immorality would be you voting against it to deny others their choices because it's something you'd personally choose not to do. Restricting someone else's choice to engage in an activity which harms no one is the immoral act. So if such a vote ever came up, you should vote to allow it and then choose not to visit any such businesses.

    Or better yet, understand that marriage for love has only existed for less than 250 years. Before that people married the person who would increase their changes of survival the most (most resources, best skills, supportive family). You can have sex as a fun, playful act without a deep emotional connection. Don't confuse love and sex and prostitution will looks far less immoral. Or are you against all fun activities? Everything from tasty food, video games, and getting a note of accomplishment from your boss are ways to activate the pleasure centers in your brain. Why do you consider the more direct physical methods to be so much different? Social media bullshitting for upvotes is far more damaging than consensual, protected sex. Poor sex education from adult who are afraid of the topic is even worse. Close to 50% of males are still sexually assaulted in USA in an effort to 'help' them.