Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday December 13 2017, @06:33PM   Printer-friendly
from the who-doesn't-like-Oreos dept.

Android Oreo was released on August 21. Adoption is at 0.5% (among devices that accessed the Play Store in early December):

Yesterday, Google released some fresh platform data explaining how many devices are running each version. Android 8.0, as you might expect, is struggling with a measly 0.5 percent share. Google's latest Pixel phones run the software, but otherwise it's hard to come by. There are some outliers, of course — the quietly impressive HTC U11, for instance — but most are still shipping with a variant of Android Nougat. Which is, well, hardly ideal for Google.

Android 7.0 and 7.1 have a combined share of 23.3 percent. Respectable, but still behind 6.0 Marshmallow (29.7 percent) and Android Lollipop (26.3 percent).

Here's an article about changes in Android 8.1.

Also at 9to5Google and Wccftech.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by bzipitidoo on Thursday December 14 2017, @01:59PM (1 child)

    by bzipitidoo (4388) on Thursday December 14 2017, @01:59PM (#609680) Journal

    This "negligence in seller's favor", a default setting that just happens to cost you more money, is everywhere. Every time I've had to get a new phone or upgrade the OS, settings that I turned off to save money somehow are turned back on, and I didn't learn of it until the bill came. You can fight with the provider and demand that they return the money, and they might, but that won't stop them from trying it again and again. Doesn't help to change providers, they all do it. Maybe slapping them hard with class action lawsuits would deter them.

    Microsoft's forced upgrading to Windows 10 pushed too far. Provoked a backlash. Sadly, that backlash wasn't big enough to inspire fundamental change. Microsoft backed off a little and waited it out, enough to smooth things over, then went right back to trying it again,

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 15 2017, @01:28AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 15 2017, @01:28AM (#610028)

    Sadly, that backlash wasn't big enough to inspire fundamental change

    Businesses that have allowed themselves to be locked into MICROS~1 technologies will likely just bend over and continue to take it.
    The gov't of Virginia Beach, Virginia is historically 1 such entity.
    What's So Bad About Microsoft? - Kein Mitleid Für MicroSoft (No Pity For MicroSoft) [googleusercontent.com] (orig) [kmfms.com]

    More of these folks should be told about Ernie Ball, Inc. and how, after a raid by the Business Software Alliance (a M$ proxy), [freerepublic.com] that company made the break via FOSS.
    Ernie Ball Rockin' without Microsoft [googleusercontent.com] (orig) [active-technologies.com]
    (The company wasn't using those copies of the goddamned proprietary software; it was just on hand-me-down machines from engineering that weren't reimaged before being given to secretaries.)

    ...and I'm pretty sure that anybody with a nerd for a friend now knows that you can test-drive $0-cost Linux without installing it.
    ...and that Linux can be installed alongside an already-installed OS until MICROS~1's junk completely gets up their noses.

    With just a bit of tryout, they will also likely find that Linux will accomplish all the tasks they typically do--out of the box.

    -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]