Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday December 18 2017, @11:35AM   Printer-friendly
from the mix-'em-with-nanoparticles-in-plants dept.

RFID tags can be used to monitor the vital signs of many people simultaneously:

Replacing devices based on 19th-century technology* and still in use, Cornell University engineers have developed a simple method for gathering blood pressure, heart rate, and breath rate from multiple patients simultaneously. It uses low-power radio-frequency signals and low-cost microchip radio-frequency identification (RFID) "tags" — similar to the ubiquitous anti-theft tags used in department stores.

The RFID tags measure internal body motion, such as a heart as it beats or blood as it pulses under skin. Powered remotely by electromagnetic energy supplied by a central reader, the tags use a new concept called "near-field coherent sensing." Mechanical motions (heartbeat, etc.) in the body modulate (modify) radio waves that are bounced off the body and internal organs by passive (no battery required) RFID tags.

The modulated signals detected by the tag then bounce back to an electronic reader, located elsewhere in the room, that gathers the data. Each tag has a unique identification code that it transmits with its signal, allowing up to 200 people to be monitored simultaneously.

The tricorder just got cheap.

*Footnote refers to the sphygmomanometer (aka blood pressure cuff or blood pressure meter) which was invented in 1881.

Monitoring vital signs over multiplexed radio by near-field coherent sensing (open, DOI: 10.1038/s41928-017-0001-0) (DX)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by donkeyhotay on Monday December 18 2017, @05:08PM

    by donkeyhotay (2540) on Monday December 18 2017, @05:08PM (#611466)

    Even after reading TFA, I still don't really understand how the device reads blood pressure. I can understand how it can read other vital signs, like heartbeat, but I don't see how a device that is merely tucked inside my shirt pocket can read my blood pressure. It would certainly be nice to have though.

    I had a doctor appointment last week and they used a small, wrist-mounted device to take my bp. I said, "That's nice. I wish I had one of those. Are they expensive?" and the nurse answered, "I think they're only about $30 or $40 dollars." I was impressed.

    A non-invasive glucose monitor is the Holy Grail of meters, however.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2