The story of net neutrality as an Obama-led takeover of the Internet has been a key Republican talking point for months, a talking point which has been refuted by internal FCC documents obtained by Motherboard using a Freedom of Information Act request. These findings were made by the independent, nonpartisan FCC Office of Inspector General an Inspector General. However, the findings were not made public prior to Thursday’s vote.
[...] First, some background: The FCC is an independent regulatory agency that is supposed to remain “free from undue influence” by the executive branch—it is not beholden to the White House, only the laws that Congress makes and tells it to regulate. This means the president cannot direct it to implement policies. In November 2014, President Obama released a statement saying that he believed the FCC should create rules protecting net neutrality, but noted that “ultimately this decision is theirs alone.”
[...] Since 2014, Republicans have pointed to net neutrality as an idea primarily promoted by President Obama, and have made it another in a long line of regulations and laws that they have sought to repeal now that Donald Trump is president. Prior to this false narrative, though, net neutrality was a bipartisan issue; the first net neutrality rules were put in place under President George W. Bush, and many Republicans worked on the 2015 rules that were just dismantled.
What happened, then, is that Republicans sold the public a narrative that wasn’t true, then used that narrative to repeal the regulations that protect the internet.
Internal FCC Report Shows Republican Anti-Net Neutrality Narrative Is False
(Score: 3, Informative) by LoRdTAW on Tuesday December 19 2017, @10:25PM (1 child)
That's the scope of the problem and the point of NN.
This is called corporate ethics and needs to be addressed separately.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 19 2017, @10:43PM
They want their net neutrality. We want our net neutrality. One law can provide both. They don't get theirs until we get ours.
BTW, it should in fact be an actual law instead of a regulation based on law that is nearly a century old. It's absurd to argue over classifying the internet as being telephone service, hard-wired data services like 1930s stock tickers, broadcast radio, and other things that just don't match up right.