Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Wednesday December 20 2017, @10:40PM   Printer-friendly
from the if-!white-then-kick() dept.

The New York City Council has unanimously passed a bill to address algorithmic discrimination by city agencies. If signed by Mayor Bill de Blasio, New York City will establish a task force to study how city agencies use data and algorithms to make decisions, and whether systems appear to discriminate against certain groups:

The bill's sponsor, Council Member James Vacca, said he was inspired by ProPublica's investigation into racially biased algorithms used to assess the criminal risk of defendants. "My ambition here is transparency, as well as accountability," Vacca said.

A previous, more sweeping version of the bill had mandated that city agencies publish the source code of all algorithms being used for "targeting services" or "imposing penalties upon persons or policing" and to make them available for "self-testing" by the public. At a hearing at City Hall in October, representatives from the mayor's office expressed concerns that this mandate would threaten New Yorkers' privacy and the government's cybersecurity.

The bill was one of two moves the City Council made last week concerning algorithms. On Thursday, the committees on health and public safety held a hearing on the city's forensic methods, including controversial tools that the chief medical examiner's office crime lab has used for difficult-to-analyze samples of DNA. As a ProPublica/New York Times investigation detailed in September, an algorithm created by the lab for complex DNA samples has been called into question by scientific experts and former crime lab employees.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by deimtee on Thursday December 21 2017, @12:14PM (2 children)

    by deimtee (3272) on Thursday December 21 2017, @12:14PM (#612760) Journal

    Fucking flood insurance. I can walk out my back door and look down at the rooves of houses half a block away. By the time my place flooded half the city would be under 20 metres of water. Yet because of banks mandating home insurance because I still have a mortgage, and the shitty state government mandating flood insurance on all home insurance, I still have to pay for fucking flood insurance.

    --
    If you cough while drinking cheap red wine it really cleans out your sinuses.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 21 2017, @02:44PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 21 2017, @02:44PM (#612798)

    Would that not cover your nice hilltop home in case of a mudslide?

    • (Score: 2) by deimtee on Thursday December 21 2017, @06:38PM

      by deimtee (3272) on Thursday December 21 2017, @06:38PM (#612882) Journal

      No chance of a mudslide here unless an asteroid hits. I'm most of the way up a long, gentle slope. It's not steep, probably only 5° or so, it just goes on a long way. There is excellent drainage, and not enough uphill land for run-off to ever be a problem.

      --
      If you cough while drinking cheap red wine it really cleans out your sinuses.