Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Thursday December 21 2017, @01:46AM   Printer-friendly
from the breaking-the-thermionic-limit dept.

Purdue University researchers have demonstrated a transistor using a negative capacitor made with hafnium zirconium oxide:

Researchers have experimentally demonstrated how to harness a property called negative capacitance for a new type of transistor that could reduce power consumption, validating a theory proposed in 2008 by a team at Purdue University.

[...] Capacitance, or the storage of electrical charge, normally has a positive value. However, using the ferroelectric material in a transistor's gate allows for negative capacitance, which could result in far lower power consumption to operate a transistor. Such an innovation could bring more efficient devices that run longer on a battery charge.

[...] Properly switching off [transistors] is of special importance to ensure that no electricity "leaks" through. This switching normally requires a minimum of 60 millivolts for every tenfold increase in current, a requirement called the thermionic limit. However, transistors that harness negative capacitance might break this fundamental limit, switching at far lower voltages and resulting in less power consumption.

Steep-slope hysteresis-free negative capacitance MoS2 transistors (DOI: 10.1038/s41565-017-0010-1) (DX)

2014: Negative capacitance in a ferroelectric capacitor (DOI: 10.1038/nmat4148) (DX)

2008: Use of Negative Capacitance to Provide Voltage Amplification for Low Power Nanoscale Devices (DOI: 10.1021/nl071804g) (DX)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 21 2017, @02:11AM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 21 2017, @02:11AM (#612677)
    How low can the voltages go before there's too high a chance of interference from noise and typical radio transmissions?
    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by takyon on Thursday December 21 2017, @02:41AM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Thursday December 21 2017, @02:41AM (#612686) Journal

    I don't know. But if there is an interference problem, maybe that limit could be extended by shielding (where you really want low power and don't care about adding some more mass).

    This could compete against the tunnel field-effect transistor [wikipedia.org] (TFET):

    TFETs are not limited by the thermal Maxwell–Boltzmann tail of carriers, which limits MOSFET drain current subthreshold swing [wikipedia.org] to about 60 mV/decade [wikipedia.org] of current at room temperature (exactly 63 mV/decade at 300 K). The concept was proposed by Chang et al while working at IBM. Joerg Appenzeller and his colleagues at IBM were the first to demonstrate that current swings below the MOSFET’s 60-mV-per-decade limit were possible. In 2004, they reported they had created a tunnel transistor with a carbon nanotube channel and a subthreshold swing of just 40 mV per decade.

    [...] Simulations in 2013 showed that TFETs using InAs [wikipedia.org]-GaSb [wikipedia.org] may have a subthreshold swing of 33 mV/decade under ideal conditions.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
  • (Score: 2, Touché) by Some call me Tim on Thursday December 21 2017, @04:38AM

    by Some call me Tim (5819) on Thursday December 21 2017, @04:38AM (#612699)

    Not sure, but if a negative bank balance is any indication, they'll chase you for years!

    --
    Questioning science is how you do science!
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 21 2017, @07:55AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 21 2017, @07:55AM (#612730)

    Very low, because the size of the structures inside CPUs and such is so small that any radio signal you will encounter will have a wavelength of many times the feature size, which makes the feature a very bad antenna for that signal. A 1/4 lambda for a 1 THz signal is 75um, which is pretty huge for modern semiconductor technology, and 1THz is very high for external interference.

    60mV is a lot; I've build DC/DC converters with current measurement signals in that range, and then you're talking about opamps, comparators, and traces on a PCB, right next to power MOSFETs switching tens or in some cases even hundreds of amps. That 60mV would be the entire signal range, the desired resolution and accuracy are in the order of 100uV. Some applications, like instrumentation amplifiers for strain gauges and such, work with even smaller signals, but they generally are separated and shielded from noise sources as much as possible.