Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Tuesday December 26 2017, @02:27AM   Printer-friendly
from the we're-on-the-leading-edge-of-1997 dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

A few days before Hurricane Irma hit South Florida, I received a query on Twitter from a graphic designer named Eric Bailey.

"Has anyone researched news sites capability to provide low-bandwidth communication of critical info during crisis situations?" he asked.

The question was timely — two days later, CNN announced that they created a text-only version of their site with no ads or videos.

The same week, NPR began promoting its text-only site, text.npr.org on social media as a way for people with limited Internet connectivity during Hurricane Irma to receive updated information.

These text-only sites — which used to be more popular in the early days of the Internet, when networks were slower and bandwidth was at a premium – are incredibly useful, and not just during natural disasters. They load much faster, don't contain any pop-ups or ads or autoplay videos, and help people with low bandwidth or limited Internet access. They're also beneficial for people with visual impairments who use screen readers to navigate the Internet. (Related: Designing Journalism Products for Accessibility.)

Source: https://www.poynter.org/news/text-only-news-sites-are-slowly-making-comeback-heres-why


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by captain normal on Tuesday December 26 2017, @05:33AM (1 child)

    by captain normal (2205) on Tuesday December 26 2017, @05:33AM (#614226)

    There is this new thing out now. It's called google. Try it sometime.

    --
    When life isn't going right, go left.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 26 2017, @08:13AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 26 2017, @08:13AM (#614241)

    Or don't, because Google is a massive surveillance engine. Even if you can stop them from identifying you, it's not good to use or encourage the use of Google. I can find what I need with DuckDuckGo the vast majority of the time, but even were that not the case, I would rather have shoddy search results than use Google.