SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:
Despite risks which include permanent hearing loss, LRADs are increasingly part of police's crowd control arsenal
After a wait of nearly ten months, MuckRock has finally received documents from the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department regarding their response to the protests surrounding President Donald Trump's inauguration early this year. Surprisingly, while we didn't receive any records related to the J20 protests, we did receive documents relating to January 21st's Women's March, which in Washington D.C. alone attracted by conservative estimates between 450,000 and 500,000 people. While it was the largest protest in the city since the anti-Vietnam War protests of the '60s and '70s, no arrests were made.
The After-Action Report provided by the DCMPD, under the header "Improvements," contains the information that the department utilized both a D.C. National Guard Jump Team, and a Long Range Acoustical Device, better known as an LRAD. The LRAD was used "to assist in instructing the crowd flows on continuing to flow away from the entrances of the stations."
Since the first documented use of an LRAD sound cannon on protesters by Pittsburgh Police during the 2009 G20 summit, LRAD use by police against activists appears to be on the rise. The Pittsburgh Police Bureau used it again in 2011 during the Super Bowl, the New York Police Department has used it several times including the Eric Garner protests and during Occupy, the Oakland Police Department also used it against Occupy protesters, and more recently and perhaps most prominently, an LRAD was deployed during the Ferguson unrest and the Standing Rock protests.
There are various models of LRAD, with military grade versions that can send voice communications up to 5.5 miles away, and slightly less powerful versions like the LRAD 500X or 300X which are what police departments generally use. All can produce a sound somewhat akin to a high-powered car alarm that can cause intense headaches, nausea, loss of balance, and potentially permanent hearing loss.
(Score: 2, Insightful) by khallow on Thursday December 28 2017, @08:39PM (4 children)
Yes, and?
Not feeling the pain over here. It was quite representative, just not quite in the way you preferred. Fix the two party system first else we wouldn't get Clinton and Trump. I don't feel like giving freebies to the Democrat party (who are the ones who would benefit from this shift in power) any more than I feel like giving freebies to the Republicans (who despite this win are probably going to lose in the end). You can lecture me sanctimoniously about what the people "chose", but in the end they voted for shit either way. Not going to expend effort to fix the parts that aren't seriously broken.
(Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Thursday December 28 2017, @08:43PM (3 children)
Oh fuck you, if it had been the other way around you'd be wetting yourself twice daily on here over it. Do you think we can't tell? You're only sanguine about this because "your guy" "won."
I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
(Score: 1) by khallow on Friday December 29 2017, @02:08AM
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 30 2017, @03:10PM (1 child)
Fuck you too ya piece of shit. As if Clinton would have been a good thing. You're so god damn stupid.
(Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Saturday December 30 2017, @05:03PM
You don't read my post history obviously. I don't trust Clinton, either of them, especially because Bill's "welfare reform" has done more to harm the poor than anything either party has ever done (or, well, HAD ever done before this fucking tax scam...) in the last 70+ years. She would still have been better short term.
I'm actually wondering if America "needs," or at least deserves, a term of Trump in office. It might be just the wakeup call the country needs to get it to join the rest of the civilized world. The problem, of course, is that we may not survive it.
I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...