Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Friday December 29 2017, @02:15PM   Printer-friendly
from the my-muscles-thank-you dept.

The New York Times has published an article about the recent work of Dr. David Baker, a biochemist who launched Rosetta@home in 2005:

Scientists Are Designing Artisanal Proteins for Your Body

[...] Scientists have studied proteins for nearly two centuries, and over that time they've worked out how cells create them from simple building blocks. They have long dreamed of assembling those elements into new proteins not found in nature.

But they've been stumped by one great mystery: how the building blocks in a protein take their final shape. David Baker, 55, the director of the Institute for Protein Design at the University of Washington, has been investigating that enigma for a quarter-century.

Now, it looks as if he and his colleagues have cracked it. Thanks in part to crowdsourced computers and smartphones belonging to over a million volunteers, the scientists have figured out how to choose the building blocks required to create a protein that will take on the shape they want.

In a series of papers published this year, Dr. Baker and his colleagues unveiled the results of this work. They have produced thousands of different kinds of proteins, which assume the shape the scientists had predicted. Often those proteins are profoundly different from any found in nature.

This expertise has led to a profound scientific advance: cellular proteins designed by man, not by nature. "We can now build proteins from scratch from first principles to do what we want," said Dr. Baker.

Massively parallel de novo protein design for targeted therapeutics (DOI: 10.1038/nature23912) (DX)

Computational design of environmental sensors for the potent opioid fentanyl (open, DOI: 10.7554/eLife.28909.001) (DX)

Evolution of a designed protein assembly encapsulating its own RNA genome (DOI: 10.1038/nature25157) (DX)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by fyngyrz on Friday December 29 2017, @11:05PM (1 child)

    by fyngyrz (6567) on Friday December 29 2017, @11:05PM (#615685) Journal

    I don't know, I read about this development, and all I can think about is how one mistake (or deliberate act) can totally ruin a species (or multiple).

    Well, the thing about prions is that nature produces them without much prodding. Basically, there's a factory available everywhere, ready to go.

    The thing about these proteins, I would hope, is that there is no such factory unless we make such a factory, and then distribution won't (in)conveniently be in our broadly-distributed foodstuffs, where we would promptly add them to our wetware as with mad cow.

    Unless, you know, actually used as an intentional weapon. Which would likely get someone nuked. Weapon of mass destruction, etc.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by terryk30 on Saturday December 30 2017, @04:05PM

    by terryk30 (1753) on Saturday December 30 2017, @04:05PM (#615870)

    These designed proteins are produced in the same factory as the "natural" ones (ribosomes that read the RNA basepair code); all you essentially need is to have their sequence encoded. From TFA:

    To see what these unnatural proteins looked like in real life, the scientists synthesized genes for them and plugged them into yeast cells, which then manufactured the lab’s creations.