Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Saturday December 30 2017, @12:41AM   Printer-friendly
from the encouraging-women-in-science dept.

NASA is collaborating with a Mattel subsidiary to create Luciana, a character who wants to become the first human to step on Mars:

NASA is collaborating with a well-known doll and book company to inspire children to dream big and reach for the stars. Through a Space Act Agreement, NASA partnered with American Girl to share the excitement of space with the public, and in particular, inspire young girls to learn about science, technology, engineering and math (STEM).

[...] American Girl is known for their series of dolls created to encourage girls to think about who they want to be when they grow up. The focus of the collaboration is the Girl of the Year doll for 2018, an 11-year-old aspiring astronaut named Luciana who wants to be the first person to put boots on Mars. As NASA's human spaceflight focus shifts to deep space, including a return to the Moon, and ultimately, Mars, the collaboration with American Girl is timely.

The partnership with American Girl affords NASA an opportunity to educate through Luciana's story the value of learning from mistakes, teamwork and remaining goal-oriented even through challenging moments. Luciana's experiences may be familiar for many of the Women@NASA, including astronauts like Megan, who have overcome obstacles to pursue their dreams.

You can buy Luciana and whisper to her about all of the frightening health effects of long-term space travel outside the comfort of the Van Allen belts.

Remember that women are lighter and less metabolically active than men, which could translate into significant mass savings for a Mars-bound crewed spacecraft.

Also at Engadget and ABC.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by looorg on Saturday December 30 2017, @03:10AM

    by looorg (578) on Saturday December 30 2017, @03:10AM (#615724)

    What exactly was wrong with it? First sentence was highly subjective but beyond that it did appear to be factually correct. It's hardly a surprise the decided to make a little brown girl doll for their STEM-effort, even thou it's more or less as far from the current STEM-reality you can come today. Is the problem that he (I assume) pointed out how obviously they are trying to present an image that is quite clearly false and made entirely of wishful thinking? Or is your objection just that you didn't approve of the tone and language?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2