Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday January 03 2018, @10:07AM   Printer-friendly
from the I-am-the-law-Judge-Dredd dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

The state of California legalised recreational cannabis use in November 2016, and it will become legal state-wide on Monday. That means anyone 21 and older will be able to buy cannabis from a licensed store, known as a dispensary.

The resentencing provisions of Proposition 64, California's cannabis legalisation initiative, have been in effect since last year, said Eunisses Hernandez, a policy coordinator at the Drug Policy Alliance, a group working to end drug prohibition. But few people know about the resentencing provision, which applies to people who are currently imprisoned or out on parole, Hernandez told Al Jazeera.

Individuals who apply for resentencing may be released from prison or have the charge on their criminal record reduced. Felonies may be lowered to misdemeanours, misdemeanours to infractions, or infractions to an outright dismissal of charges.

Resentencing will likely affect thousands of lives, since at least 500,000 marijuana-related arrests have been recorded in California over the last decade, Hernandez said.

[...] Several groups in the US have urged authorities to include changes to drug-related criminal offences in their efforts to legalise recreational cannabis.

Proponents of cannabis legalisation feared that allowing people with past drug convictions to get out of jail or reduce their sentences would lower the chance that the laws would pass at all. "There was, in many cases, a reluctance to bring this up," he told Al Jazeera.

Today, opponents of resentencing provisions often argue that retrying these cases puts "a very, very large potential burden on the courts", Sterling said.

Law enforcement officers may also contend that a guilty plea to cannabis possession may follow the dropping of more serious charges, such as possession with the intent to distribute - "and so to make a blanket change without looking at all of the underlying facts of the arrest would mean that more serious offenders would have their records expunged", Sterling said.

Ultimately, Sterling said it is most important to make sure people who may be affected by a resentencing law are aware that the law exists in the first place.

"The key thing, I think, is the ability for people to re-enter the economy and society free of those encumbrances," he said. "We would also say they are eligible to vote, they are eligible for jury duty, that all of their civil rights are restored."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by ElizabethGreene on Wednesday January 03 2018, @03:44PM (3 children)

    by ElizabethGreene (6748) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday January 03 2018, @03:44PM (#617175) Journal

    If you have proof of possession with intent, then the defendant should be charged with that. Charging them with possession, distribution, possession with intent, and a laundry list of other charges just to get them to plead guilty to possession is extortion.

    IMHO, the bargain system is a bug, not a feature.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +4  
       Insightful=4, Total=4
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by frojack on Wednesday January 03 2018, @06:16PM (2 children)

    by frojack (1554) on Wednesday January 03 2018, @06:16PM (#617265) Journal

    If you have proof of possession with intent, then the defendant should be charged with that.

    You've hit on the simple solution to the question.

    If you are incarcerated for ONLY possession of marijuana, just let them go.
    If there were ANY other felony convictions, make them sue for re-sentencing only on the possession charge.

    There is virtually nobody in jail for ONLY a personal use possession charge.
    Those sentences usually were for 90 days in county lockup, or simple probation
    Once you eliminate those you will have 27 jail beds available.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    • (Score: 2) by MrGuy on Wednesday January 03 2018, @06:57PM (1 child)

      by MrGuy (1007) on Wednesday January 03 2018, @06:57PM (#617287)

      There is virtually nobody in jail for ONLY a personal use possession charge.

      Citation needed.

      • (Score: 3, Insightful) by bob_super on Wednesday January 03 2018, @07:27PM

        by bob_super (1357) on Wednesday January 03 2018, @07:27PM (#617301)

        That's correct. The whites are out, and the dark-skinned ones also assaulted the officer's car with their face, before causing major property damage with their blood, and refusing to cooperate by being unconscious.