Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday January 03 2018, @10:07AM   Printer-friendly
from the I-am-the-law-Judge-Dredd dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

The state of California legalised recreational cannabis use in November 2016, and it will become legal state-wide on Monday. That means anyone 21 and older will be able to buy cannabis from a licensed store, known as a dispensary.

The resentencing provisions of Proposition 64, California's cannabis legalisation initiative, have been in effect since last year, said Eunisses Hernandez, a policy coordinator at the Drug Policy Alliance, a group working to end drug prohibition. But few people know about the resentencing provision, which applies to people who are currently imprisoned or out on parole, Hernandez told Al Jazeera.

Individuals who apply for resentencing may be released from prison or have the charge on their criminal record reduced. Felonies may be lowered to misdemeanours, misdemeanours to infractions, or infractions to an outright dismissal of charges.

Resentencing will likely affect thousands of lives, since at least 500,000 marijuana-related arrests have been recorded in California over the last decade, Hernandez said.

[...] Several groups in the US have urged authorities to include changes to drug-related criminal offences in their efforts to legalise recreational cannabis.

Proponents of cannabis legalisation feared that allowing people with past drug convictions to get out of jail or reduce their sentences would lower the chance that the laws would pass at all. "There was, in many cases, a reluctance to bring this up," he told Al Jazeera.

Today, opponents of resentencing provisions often argue that retrying these cases puts "a very, very large potential burden on the courts", Sterling said.

Law enforcement officers may also contend that a guilty plea to cannabis possession may follow the dropping of more serious charges, such as possession with the intent to distribute - "and so to make a blanket change without looking at all of the underlying facts of the arrest would mean that more serious offenders would have their records expunged", Sterling said.

Ultimately, Sterling said it is most important to make sure people who may be affected by a resentencing law are aware that the law exists in the first place.

"The key thing, I think, is the ability for people to re-enter the economy and society free of those encumbrances," he said. "We would also say they are eligible to vote, they are eligible for jury duty, that all of their civil rights are restored."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 04 2018, @02:37AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 04 2018, @02:37AM (#617470)

    Supposedly Sulla is an older gent, so your "prior brainwashing" point is 100% accurate. Hell, I am in my 30s and have a friend who just couldn't come to grips with weed even though he'd smoked it himself and one day he said "It must just be the fact that it is illegal!"

    A smart person who couldn't figure out why he was so against weed. Because it is illegal? Lol, dude admitted to driving drunk a few times. The brainwashing really fucking worked, so we'll have to deal with malcontents like Sulla for a while. Though he said he voted for legalization, so massive props for common sense overriding the cultural washing machine.

  • (Score: 1) by Sulla on Friday January 05 2018, @12:20AM

    by Sulla (5173) on Friday January 05 2018, @12:20AM (#618107) Journal

    Only 27 but was one of only a handful of kids who never smoked it in k-12. My issues with it stem from watching everyone around me get progressively dumber and make progressively worse life decisions and then play it off by blaming the pot or the weed rather than their decision to use the substance. I don't doubt there are not some medical uses for pot, but it isn't some wonder drug that cures every cancer ever like it was painted before legalization. My vote for legalization was because people are free to do to themselves what they want and if people are free to choose to do long term damage to their liver and kidneys then why aren't they free to make themselves dumber as well.

    Although I would not have voted any differently knowing what I do now, I am really tired of smelling pot everywhere I go. I was not expecting public smoking to be as prevalent as it is. When I am out smoking a cigar I don't puff as I walk past people, I expect the same courtesy when someone walking pot walks past me.

    As a note pot smoking in public is not legal, but the police don't enforce it.

    --
    Ceterum censeo Sinae esse delendam