Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday January 04 2018, @02:11PM   Printer-friendly
from the what-if-you-can't-program-your-way-out-of-a-paper-bag? dept.

Agile Development is hip. It's hot. All the cool kids are doing it.

But it doesn't work.

Before I get into why this "Agile" stuff is horrible, let's describe where Agile/Scrum can work. It can work for a time-sensitive and critical project of short duration (6 weeks max) that cross-cuts the business and has no clear manager, because it involves people from multiple departments. You can call it a "Code Red" or call it a Scrum or a "War Room" if you have a physical room for it.

Note that "Agile" comes from the consulting world. It suits well the needs of a small consulting firm, not yet very well-established, that lands one big-ticket project and needs to deliver it quickly, despite changing requirements and other potential bad behavior from the client. It works well when you have a relatively homogeneous talent level and a staff of generalists, which might also be true for an emerging web consultancy.

As a short-term methodology when a firm faces an existential risk or a game-changing opportunity, I'm not opposed to the "Code Red"/"crunch time"/Scrum practice of ignoring peoples' career goals and their individual talents. I have in mind that this "Code Red" state should exist for no more than 6 weeks per year in a well-run business. Even that's less than ideal: the ideal is zero. Frequent crises reflect poorly on management.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by tibman on Thursday January 04 2018, @08:20PM (2 children)

    by tibman (134) Subscriber Badge on Thursday January 04 2018, @08:20PM (#617921)

    Ouch! Maybe you have discovered the real reason why engineers hate TDD? : P
    We test a lot at work but don't practice TDD as a religion. It does certainly result in less production support required.

    --
    SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by turgid on Thursday January 04 2018, @09:12PM (1 child)

    by turgid (4318) Subscriber Badge on Thursday January 04 2018, @09:12PM (#617956) Journal

    We test a lot at work but don't practice TDD as a religion.

    Religion and science/engineering don't mix, in general.

    What continually amazes me is the number of people apparently older, wiser and more intelligent than me that think they don't need TDD because they're so great and their code is so marvelous. They apparently haven't heard of the four stages of competency, or think they're already at the top: 1 Unconscious Incompetent, 2 Conscious Incompetent, 3 Conscious Competent, 4 Unconscious Competent.

    You should never get to stage 4 when writing code for the following reason. If you do, then you're doing something you already did before, so why aren't you reusing it?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 05 2018, @02:25AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 05 2018, @02:25AM (#618172)

      Religion and science/engineering don't mix, in general.

      Yes, but sometimes they work out amazingly well.
      Religion is basically faith.
      Part of what got Apple to where they are not was the faith of SJ in knowing where to go.