Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Saturday January 06 2018, @08:17PM   Printer-friendly
from the just-say-no dept.

Encrypt and lock your electronic devices, because the border agents want to touch them:

Customs officers stationed at the American border and at airports searched an estimated 30,200 cellphones, computers and other electronic devices of people entering and leaving the United States last year — an almost 60 percent increase from 2016, according to Homeland Security Department data released on Friday.

Despite the surge, Customs and Border Protection officials said the searches affected fewer than 1 percent of the more than 300 million travelers who arrived in the United States last year.

Homeland Security officials say border searches are an important investigative tool and are used sparingly by its agents. "In this digital age, border searches of electronic devices are essential to enforcing the law at the U.S. border and to protecting the American people," said John Wagner, the deputy executive assistant commissioner at Customs and Border Protection. Mr. Wagner said the agency was committed to preserving the rights and civil liberties of travelers whose devices are searched.

Also at ABC.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by crafoo on Sunday January 07 2018, @12:36PM (3 children)

    by crafoo (6639) on Sunday January 07 2018, @12:36PM (#619116)

    They can't help it. In all seriousness, they cannot. It's quite honestly a fundamental truth of the system. This is why only very, very limited power should be granted to governments. They will expand, mus-interpret in bad faith, and abuse any finger-hold you give them over your lives. Fixing the situation doesn't happen through more laws. It happens through punishing those acting contrary to the common good and their oaths of office. Unlikely, probably impossible.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=2, Informative=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by dry on Monday January 08 2018, @01:56AM (2 children)

    by dry (223) on Monday January 08 2018, @01:56AM (#619358) Journal

    Granting very limited powers to the government has been tried. I think the experiment was a country called the United States of America.

    • (Score: 2) by requerdanos on Monday January 08 2018, @03:52PM (1 child)

      by requerdanos (5997) Subscriber Badge on Monday January 08 2018, @03:52PM (#619540) Journal

      Granting very limited powers to the government has been tried.

      It both didn't work (not enough power for necessary government functions) and was abandoned (not enough power to oppress some for the gain of others).

      Do you think there's a way back to enough power for the government to function, but limited enough not to oppress? (I mean, short of revolution)

      • (Score: 2) by dry on Monday January 08 2018, @04:31PM

        by dry (223) on Monday January 08 2018, @04:31PM (#619562) Journal

        The government has to be more scared of the people punishing them, by throwing them out, during elections or even through mass protests including things such as general strikes.
        Basically election reform as right now you're stuck with this 2 party system where the parties are in agreement on too many things and there is no compromise either on the things that they don't agree with.
        Your system was well designed for the 18th century but has evolved in ways that don't seem democratic so parts of the Constitution would need rewriting, something your system is setup for as the States can override Congress.
        If the people really cared, they could demand change. America is still enough of a democracy that non-violent change should be possible, if the people wanted it.