SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Google provides colorful bicycles for its Mountain View area employees to ride. But hundreds of these bicycles go missing every week, and some have been found tossed in a local creek:
"The disappearances often aren't the work of ordinary thieves, however. Many residents of Mountain View, a city of 80,000 that has effectively become Google's company town, see the employee perk as a community service," the Wall Street Journal reported.
And for the company, here's one Google bike use case that's got to burn a little: 68-year-old Sharon Veach told the newspaper that she sometimes uses one of the bicycles as part of her commute: to the offices of Google's arch foe, Oracle. Google doesn't really want non-Googlers using the bikes, "but it's OK if you do," Veach explained.
Google has hired 30 contractors using five vans to recover lost and stolen bikes, about a third of which are equipped with GPS trackers. The teams carry waders and grappling hooks for pulling bikes out of creeks.
The company can't even confront people who appear to have stolen their bikes:
Ensuring that only company workers are riding the "Gbikes" is not particularly straightforward: some Googlers don't exactly fit the stereotype of the Silicon Valley techie. Company transportation executive Jeral Poskey told the paper he once took action when he saw what appeared to be a homeless woman on a commandeered Google bike. "If I could describe her, you would agree with me," Poskey said. "She looked all panicked, and then she showed me her Google badge."
(Score: 2) by Arik on Monday January 08 2018, @02:39PM (1 child)
I disagree. IF there's any failure at all here, it's a failure of google to assert said rights. But it sounds like that was done deliberately, and is not a 'failure' either.
Google introduced these things all smiles and sunshine, 'our contribution' and I'm pretty sure at some point they've explicitly said it's fine for everyone in the area to use them, if not they've certainly failed to communicate otherwise. So at this point anyone *using* (but not abusing) the bikes can certainly claim a good faith belief it was allowed, and harm is de minimis.
The folks dumping them in the creek are a different matter though.
If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
(Score: 2) by Wootery on Monday January 08 2018, @03:27PM
If they really did tell the community that the bikes may be used by anyone, then I agree that Google don't get complain when people take them up on it making legitimate use of the bikes. I'm not convinced Google ever said any such thing, though.