Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday January 08 2018, @08:04PM   Printer-friendly
from the suspected-is-now-guilty dept.

Internet slowdowns at home aren't just annoying anymore. They can be hazardous to your health or dangerous if you're in an area that freezes.

Internet service provider Armstrong Zoom has roughly a million subscribers in the Northeastern part of the U.S. and is keen to punish those it believes are using file-sharing services.

The ISP's response to allegedly naughty customers is bandwidth throttling -- which is when an ISP intentionally slows down your internet service based on what you're doing online. In this case, when said ISP believes you're doing something illegal.

As part of its throttling routine, Armstrong Zoom's warning letter openly threatens its suspected file-sharing customers about its ability to use or control their webcams and connected thermostats.

The East Coast company stated: "Please be advised that this may affect other services which you may have connected to your internet service, such as the ability to control your thermostat remotely or video monitoring services."

Source: https://www.engadget.com/2018/01/05/pirates-risk-being-left-in-the-cold/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by JoeMerchant on Monday January 08 2018, @08:56PM (4 children)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Monday January 08 2018, @08:56PM (#619695)

    There's a profile, if you move more than X bytes a month, particularly in such and such size chunks, there's a higher probability that you're "one of those people," and they will treat you accordingly. If you have a choice in ISPs, this isn't such a problem. Unfortunately, with private monopolies this kind of profiling amounts to illegal discrimination - but now you get the fun of proving damages in a court case before there's any real hope of justice/relief.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by DannyB on Monday January 08 2018, @09:04PM (3 children)

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Monday January 08 2018, @09:04PM (#619702) Journal

    An interesting case would be to have actual damages. Prove them. And set a precedent.

    In such a case, the ISP cannot know what is in your traffic and they have no right to know. That is a core argument of the action, that they are unfairly discriminating. Maybe there would be a lawyer that would take such a case on contingency.

    --
    The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 08 2018, @09:32PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 08 2018, @09:32PM (#619722)

      Yeah, why don't you get right on that?

      • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Monday January 08 2018, @11:07PM

        by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Monday January 08 2018, @11:07PM (#619765) Journal

        Because it's so much easier to say than to do.

        --
        The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
    • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday January 08 2018, @09:40PM

      by JoeMerchant (3937) on Monday January 08 2018, @09:40PM (#619726)

      Maybe there would be a lawyer that would take such a case

      Absolutely....

      Maybe there would be a lawyer that would take such a case on contingency.

      Not in the reality I live in.

      --
      🌻🌻 [google.com]