Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Saturday January 13 2018, @09:31AM   Printer-friendly
from the uber-software-not-so-uber dept.

Uber, like many companies that operate internationally, uses software to remotely disable its employees' laptops and smartphones.

As Uber has expanded -- opening offices in 78 countries worldwide -- sometimes local authorities have raided its offices. Police have wanted emails, documents and information on drivers and employees. It's happened in Paris, Hong Kong, Montreal and other countries.

In order to address these types of situations, the ride-hailing company uses software to protect its data, which is commonplace among companies that operate internationally. One type of software the company devised and reportedly used from Spring 2015 to late 2016 was called Ripley, according to a report by Bloomberg.

Ripley -- which was said to be named after Sigourney Weaver's character in the 1979 sci-fi movie "Alien" -- could remotely disable, lock or change the password on employees' computers and smartphones.

The idea was for Uber's team at its San Francisco headquarters to be able to shut down a device if necessary. The company used it at least two dozen times in situations with authorities in foreign countries, according to Bloomberg.

Uber said it no longer uses Ripley because it wasn't effective. It now uses an off-the-shelf software called Prey and another type of software it built called uLocker. Uber said this software is necessary to protect company data, along with the privacy of passengers, drivers and Uber employees.

[...] As for software like Ripley, Prey or uLocker, Uber said there's nothing secretive about it. It's basically the same software someone would use if they lost their smartphone.

"For instance, if an employee loses their laptop, we have the ability to remotely log them out of Uber's systems to prevent someone else from accessing private user data through that laptop," the Uber spokeswoman said.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 13 2018, @04:33PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 13 2018, @04:33PM (#621838)

    What company doesn't have this ability, on *their* equipment? THEY would be the 'news flash'...

    You may have missed the point, which is not that they have this software, but that they're allegedly using the capabilities afforded to them by these software packages to actively 'pervert the course of justice' by wiping evidence remotely from a.n.other.location when the authorities try to collect it in the course of 'busting' them at a.different.location.. talk about the law of unintended consequences in action.

    Sneaky? yes, greasy? yes, and yet somehow I ended up grudgingly admiring their chutzpah after reading about this.

    Time to get some more popcorn in, I can see this being fun.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Informative=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2