Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday January 15 2018, @01:56AM   Printer-friendly
from the representative-of-the-people dept.

Chelsea Manning eyes U.S. Senate seat for Maryland

Chelsea Manning, the transgender U.S. Army soldier who served seven years in military prison for leaking classified data, is seeking the Democratic Party's nomination for the U.S. Senate seat from Maryland, according to Federal election filings seen on Saturday.

[...] Democratic Senator Ben Cardin was elected in 2006 to that seat and is expected to run for re-election this year. He is the senior Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Cardin was easily re-elected in 2012, beating his Republican challenger by 30 points in the heavily-Democratic state.

Previously: Chelsea Manning Released from Prison, Remains on Active Duty Pending Appeal
Harvard Dean Rescinds Chelsea Manning's Visiting Fellow Invitation, Calling It a 'Mistake'


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Azuma Hazuki on Monday January 15 2018, @03:45AM (3 children)

    by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Monday January 15 2018, @03:45AM (#622412) Journal

    I've been feeling and thinking the exact same things, but what can we do? The two party system has a stranglehold on the US's elections, and when Sanders, who would probably have been the best choice and would have kicked Trump's fat ass up and down the eastern seaboard, tried to run, the Democratic party machine stabbed him in the back.

    Until we get money out of politics, until Citizens United is reversed, there is no hope. Money has strangled the election system to death.

    --
    I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +4  
       Insightful=4, Total=4
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 15 2018, @08:50AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 15 2018, @08:50AM (#622493)

    And either resettle somewhere else, or create a new country of your own.

    Neither will be easy choices, but the problem is that right now there are essentially no choices in American Politics.

    In order to gain choices we need people to stop campaigning as either Democrats or Republicans, and we need citizens to stop voting FOR Democrats or Republicans on the principle of the matter, regardless of which partisan side they normally would follow.

    If both of those choices among the potential electees and the voting base can be pushed to happen, then we can move on to what is required to actually *FIX* the system, which at this point is either abolishing the electoral college, OR eliminating the voting positions and simply making the votes given based on the states final vote results (has the same effect and eliminates the possibility of the electors voting against their constiuents) while protecting the 'all 50 states are not equal population-wise. Following that is removing first past the post, and choosing either a point pool and points based system, or voting tiers and iterating through each tier until a candidate has a clear win, ideally of either 51 or 67 percent majority, which ensures the candidate elected should recieved a majority approval rating at least until he begins acting on (or against the) behalf of the United States of America.

    Those changes could also provide the necessary push to see more of the inactive voter base to reregister and actually feel their vote makes a difference, since an official who might not pass in FPTP voting may find that the second or third tier of votes pushes them way ahead of the other candidates, who were only popular amongst their party-base while broader approval was gained by a third party candidate across multiple ideological groups.

    Personally I have lost whatever faith in America I might have once held and am going to try and do a better job wherever I end up. Perhaps the rest of you can elicit some change that will make me regret that decision, but as it stands there is nothing for me to lament losing here.

  • (Score: 2) by beckett on Monday January 15 2018, @11:02AM (1 child)

    by beckett (1115) on Monday January 15 2018, @11:02AM (#622526)

    i think you have the overall strategy corralled: get the money out of poiltics. On a direct action level, work through the existing infrastructure on a municipal and state level. Use the Tenth Amendment leverage States' Rights for something other than a dog whistle for segregation and against gay marriage.

    I agree somewhat with the AC that replied to you: move elsewhere not to turn tail, but to find venues that are more ripe for change. Use the Constitutions right to free movement; don't occupy a park, but move to places where the change you want to see is more possible. Forward thinkers should not keep concentrating in California or New York; the bravest of you should establish footholds and find fellow travelers in Tennessee, Louisiana, Wyoming, South Dakota, Texas, and Alabama. municipal politics has even less inertia than either federal or state level politics.

    By no means would it be easy or quick. But the Supreme court ruling against North Carolina redistricting policy is as potent and promising as Citizens United is discouraging. Lets see what happens in Wisconsin next with regards to gerrymandering.

    Above all, people have to be motivated to get involved, and increase voter turnout more than polarization and anger over the other tribe have consumed the larger conversation. There has to be more effort for bipartisan collaboration; devolving into further polarization only will exacerbates the crass tribalism that has shaped the last two decades of federal US politics.