Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday January 15 2018, @03:47PM   Printer-friendly
from the my-house-my-rules dept.

Submitted via IRC for AndyTheAbsurd

The Satanic Temple, an activist group based in Salem, Massachusetts, is threatening to sue Twitter for religious discrimination after one of its co-founders had his Twitter account permanently suspended.

Lucien Greaves, the Satanic Temple's co-founder and spokesman, said his Twitter account was permanently suspended without any notice after he asked his followers to report a tweet that called for the Satanic Temple to be burned down.

"We're talking to lawyers today," Greaves said Friday about whether he planned to take legal action.

Source: http://www.newsweek.com/satanic-temple-threatens-sue-twitter-over-religious-discrimination-780148


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Bot on Monday January 15 2018, @09:27PM (2 children)

    by Bot (3902) on Monday January 15 2018, @09:27PM (#622747) Journal

    well done, you should have spotted two.

    --
    Account abandoned.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by aristarchus on Monday January 15 2018, @10:53PM (1 child)

    by aristarchus (2645) on Monday January 15 2018, @10:53PM (#622821) Journal

    If you put spots on your strawman, that just signals that is is not real, and therefore ineffective as a scarecrow. I think we are dealing more with a fallacy of ambiguity here, or possibly an argumentum ad ignoratiam advocatus diaboli.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 16 2018, @12:11AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 16 2018, @12:11AM (#622865)

      I know you'd rather speak Greek but it's spelled "ignorantiam".

      Anyway if we don't want no strawman around I vote for post hoc ergo propter hoc.