SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
On January 15th, 2018, World Socialist Web Site reported that users are unable to share a promotional video for a January 16th online meeting, "Organizing Resistance to Internet Censorship."
Facebook has blocked users from sharing a social media video promoting the January 16 online meeting "Organizing resistance to Internet censorship," featuring World Socialist Web Site International Editorial Board Chairman David North and Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Chris Hedges. The initial post of the video, uploaded Friday, cannot be shared by any user. Those who attempt to do so receive an error message that seems to imply a technical failure.
Users reported, however, that upon clicking "If you think you're seeing this message by mistake, please let us know," they were presented with a notice that clearly indicates the content had been blocked in the name of keeping Facebook "safe."
WSWS published an open letter about internet censorship and net neutrality on November 25. The FCC repealed net neutrality rules on December 14, 2017.
In this AC's opinion, Facebook is certainly within their rights to refuse to host any content for any reasons they choose. However, for many people, Facebook is the internet.
Should we worry about entrenched services such as Facebook and Google using their positions to suppress information? Does the presence or absence of net neutrality change one's analysis of the situation?
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Thursday January 18 2018, @12:33AM (4 children)
Like in: ideally the best prepared person gets to be elected to push the strategy/tactics required for the best governance of USofA population... and yet you finish with the Orange Clown at the head.
While this (by the number game) needs not** to end in the demise of USA , in the conditions a business (with lower resources than a country) or a project the failures due to mismanagement tend to be more frequent. For every Mondragon success there are hundreds of other cooperatives that failed.
Agreed.
It boils down to: human nature does not guarantee the success of socialism - even if it does not guarantee its failure.
---
**even if the survival result is still not guaranteed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 18 2018, @02:21AM (1 child)
...for the best governance of USofA
...when you have a media whose job it is to inform the public.
When you have the Lamestream Media that USA has, whose job it is to maximize profits for The Ownership Class, you get Drumpf.
I've mentioned the statement by CBS's CEO numerous times.
They knew perfectly well what they were doing to the country--and they didn't care.
-- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Thursday January 18 2018, @02:49AM
I hope you'll agree that's necessary but not sufficient.
E.g. an informed public is absolutely useless if that public is only able to react based on "The Truth" that was fed to them, with no thinking of their own (one would contrast "education" vs "indoctrination/taming" as concepts here?)
Which does show that the condition to reach the the status of ideal are far from trivial. With the immediate corollary: the more necessary condition, the less probable the ideal status.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 2) by dry on Thursday January 18 2018, @04:08AM (1 child)
Nature itself does not guarantee the success of anything. Lots of failures in new businesses in any system and even the forest outside sees only a few trees succeed after millions of seeds start out.
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Thursday January 18 2018, @04:29AM
But it does. Entropy, for instance, will ever be higher as the time passes - uninterrupted growth is how one usually define "successful", right?
(grin)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford