Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday January 18 2018, @12:54PM   Printer-friendly
from the gonna-need-ultra-thin-cooling dept.

Engineers worldwide have been developing alternative ways to provide greater memory storage capacity on even smaller computer chips. Previous research into two-dimensional atomic sheets for memory storage has failed to uncover their potential -- until now.

A team of electrical engineers at The University of Texas at Austin, in collaboration with Peking University scientists, has developed the thinnest memory storage device with dense memory capacity, paving the way for faster, smaller and smarter computer chips for everything from consumer electronics to big data to brain-inspired computing.

"For a long time, the consensus was that it wasn't possible to make memory devices from materials that were only one atomic layer thick," said Deji Akinwande, associate professor in the Cockrell School of Engineering's Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. "With our new 'atomristors,' we have shown it is indeed possible."

Made from 2-D nanomaterials, the "atomristors" -- a term Akinwande coined -- improve upon memristors, an emerging memory storage technology with lower memory scalability. He and his team published their findings in the January issue of Nano Letters.

"Atomristors will allow for the advancement of Moore's Law at the system level by enabling the 3-D integration of nanoscale memory with nanoscale transistors on the same chip for advanced computing systems," Akinwande said.

Source:https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/01/180117114918.htm

Journal Reference:

Ruijing Ge, Xiaohan Wu, Myungsoo Kim, Jianping Shi, Sushant Sonde, Li Tao, Yanfeng Zhang, Jack C. Lee, Deji Akinwande. Atomristor: Nonvolatile Resistance Switching in Atomic Sheets of Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. Nano Letters, 2017; 18 (1): 434 DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04342


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by anotherblackhat on Thursday January 18 2018, @03:39PM

    by anotherblackhat (4722) on Thursday January 18 2018, @03:39PM (#624169)

    ...a hundred layer device is not 100x as costly.

    Stacking is an improvement, no argument there, and yes density matters, but...
    While 100x isn't 100 times as costly as 1x,
    100x is pretty close to twice as costly as 50x.

    Point being, stacking offers a diminishing improvement.
    Moore's law is an exponential improvement.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2