Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday January 22 2018, @10:28AM   Printer-friendly
from the because-we-already-know-how-to-make-our-own-booze dept.

Forget those long lines at the pharmacy: Someday soon, you might be making your own medicines at home. That's because researchers have tailored a 3D printer to synthesize pharmaceuticals and other chemicals from simple, widely available starting compounds fed into a series of water bottle–size reactors. The work, they say, could digitize chemistry, allowing users to synthesize almost any compound anywhere in the world.

"It could become a milestone paper, a really seminal paper," says Fraser Stoddart, a chemist and chemistry Nobel laureate at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, who was not involved with the work. "This is one of those articles that has to make [people] sit up and take notice."

[...] In today's issue of Science, [Leroy] Cronin and his colleagues report printing a series of interconnected reaction vessels that carry out four different chemical reactions involving 12 separate steps, from filtering to evaporating different solutions. By adding different reagents and solvents at the right times and in a precise order, they were able to convert simple, widely available starting compounds into a muscle relaxant called baclofen. And by designing reactionware to carry out different chemical reactions with different reagents, they produced other medicines, including an anticonvulsant and a drug to fight ulcers and acid reflux.

[...] But it remains to be seen whether drug regulators will go along with a new way of making medicines. To do so, agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration will need to rewrite their rules for validating the safety of medicines. Instead of signing off on the production facility and manufactured drug samples, regulators would have to validate that reactionware produces the desired medication.

Source: ScienceMag


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Monday January 22 2018, @12:18PM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Monday January 22 2018, @12:18PM (#626041) Journal

    One way for the individual to "easily" "print" drugs would be to use genetically engineered yeast:

    'Home-Brewed Morphine' Made Possible [soylentnews.org]
    Genetically Engineered Yeasts Produce Thebaine and Hydrocodone [soylentnews.org]

    To my knowledge, the genomes of those yeast have not been published, and they aren't available outside of the small number of labs that work on them. If anyone knows any differently or knows any other drugs that have been produced by engineered yeast, let us know.

    The yeast approach would be an imperfect way of producing the drugs you want, but maybe there are ways to extend the approach. For example, engineer a switch statement [wikipedia.org] in the genome that lets one strain of yeast produce up to 10 different drugs based on some external factor (such as a chemical or light trigger). You could see a problem happening with that approach, such as some % of the yeast mutating or not working properly, mixing a little hydrocodone into your LSD. But that could be averted by using a centrifuge or something else inside your machine to separate the desired drug from any unwanted components.

    At least one proposed chemputer [theguardian.com] does not use any GMO yeast but simply uses novel approaches to chemical reactions in order to miniaturize them and combine steps into a single machine that could produce more than one drug:

    So far Cronin's lab has been creating quite straightforward reaction chambers, and simple three-step sequences of reactions to "print" inorganic molecules. The next stage, also successfully demonstrated, and where things start to get interesting, is the ability to "print" catalysts into the walls of the reactionware. Much further down the line – Cronin has a gift for extrapolation – he envisages far more complex reactor environments, which would enable chemistry to be done "in the presence of a liver cell that has cancer, or a newly identified superbug", with all the implications that might have for drug research.

    In the shorter term, his team is looking at ways in which relatively simple drugs – ibuprofen is the example they are using – might be successfully produced in their 3D printer or portable "chemputer". If that principle can be established, then the possibilities suddenly seem endless. "Imagine your printer like a refrigerator that is full of all the ingredients you might require to make any dish in Jamie Oliver's new book," Cronin says. "Jamie has made all those recipes in his own kitchen and validated them. If you apply that idea to making drugs, you have all your ingredients and you follow a recipe that a drug company gives you. They will have validated that recipe in their lab. And when you have downloaded it and enabled the printer to read the software it will work. The value is in the recipe, not in the manufacture. It is an app, essentially."

    [...] Not surprisingly Cronin is excited by these prospects, though he continually adds the caveat that they are still essentially at the "science fiction" stage of this process. Aside from the "personal chemputer" aspect of the idea, he is perhaps most enthused about the way the reactionware model could transform the process of drug discovery and testing. "Over time it may redefine how we make molecules," he believes. "In particular we can think about doing complex reactions in the presence of complex chemical baggage like a cell, and at a fraction of the current cost." Printed reactionware could vastly speed up the discovery of new proteins and even antibiotics. In contrast to existing technologies the chemical "search engine" could be combined with biological structures such as blood vessels, or pathogens, offering a way to quickly screen the effects of new molecular combinations.

    Innovations like microfluidic channels [nature.com] are probably going to be very relevant for the hypothetical chemputer.

    Could it be used to create poisons or chemical weapons? Date rape drugs?

    Just because a yeast strain or chemputer could create morphine [wikipedia.org] does not mean that the effort will easily translate to a general approach capable of creating thousands of molecules, including LSD, ibuprofen [wikipedia.org], VX [wikipedia.org], rophynol [wikipedia.org], TNT [wikipedia.org], etc., all in the same machine with a push of a button. But we could be moving ever closer in that direction, so expect the authoritarians in government to be keeping a close eye on this field.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2