Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.

Firefox and Chrome Extensions That Block Add-On Management

posted by janrinok on Monday January 22 2018, @12:02PM   Printer-friendly
from the problem-and-solution dept.

Apparition writes:

A new breed of malicious Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome extensions uses techniques to make their removal much more difficult.

Malwarebytes revealed in a blog post how these extensions block user access to the add-on management page of the browser and therefore removal from within the browser.

The Chrome extension Tiempo en colombia en vivo was available on the official Chrome Web Store but was distributed mostly on third-party websites.

The browser extension monitors open tabs while it runs. If the user opens chrome://extensions/, it will redirect the request to chrome://apps/?r=extensions automatically. This is done so that the user cannot remove the extension as it is not listed on the apps page.

The Firefox add-on FF Helper Protection shows similar traits. It monitors open tabs for the string about:addons to close the tab automatically if it is found.

Both extensions have in common that they prevent users from accessing the add-on management interface of the browser.

The article includes detailed instructions on how to remove the malicious Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome extensions.

 

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Firefox and Chrome Extensions That Block Add-On Management | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 13 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 2) by Pino P on Monday January 22 2018, @02:50PM (4 children)

    by Pino P (4721) on Monday January 22 2018, @02:50PM (#626078) Journal

    Who would pay for the review of each extension? If Google, then where would Google get the money? Even if ad revenue from Search is enough to keep Search, Chromium, and the present Chrome Web Store alive, it might not be enough to fund the manual review that you recommend.

    Or would you prefer a situation more like that of the iOS App Store, where your favorite legitimate extension would be removed from Chrome Web Store because their developers could no longer afford the $99 per year fee to continue to publish an extension that brings in no direct revenue?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  
    Total Score:   2  

  • (Score: 3, Informative) by Grishnakh on Monday January 22 2018, @03:04PM (2 children)

    by Grishnakh (2831) on Monday January 22 2018, @03:04PM (#626086)

    Well, Google already funds and produces the Chrome browser for free, so obviously they're getting some very significant business benefit from making what is now the world's most popular browser. The same benefit should pay for doing some better review of apps on the Chrome store.

    • (Score: 2) by Pino P on Monday January 22 2018, @07:15PM (1 child)

      by Pino P (4721) on Monday January 22 2018, @07:15PM (#626191) Journal

      Even if ad revenue from Search is enough to keep Search, Chromium, and the present Chrome Web Store alive, it might not be enough to fund the manual review that you recommend.

      obviously they're getting some very significant business benefit from making what is now the world's most popular browser. The same benefit should pay for doing some better review of apps on the Chrome store.

      My hypothesis is that though this "very significant business benefit" exists, it isn't large enough to justify spending money on clearing out the inevitable backlog that a change from automatic to manual review would entail without some additional revenue source.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 23 2018, @10:34AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 23 2018, @10:34AM (#626489)

        My hypothesis is that though this "very significant business benefit" exists, it isn't large enough to justify spending money on clearing out the inevitable backlog that a change from automatic to manual review would entail without some additional revenue source.

        Yes, we get your point. We just disagree based on Google's $795 billion market value.

  • (Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 22 2018, @09:04PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 22 2018, @09:04PM (#626235)

    "How would a multi-fucktillion dollar business fund something"
    Yeah, I wonder.