Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Friday January 26 2018, @07:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the oh-my-god-give-it-a-rest-already!!! dept.

Prime Minister Theresa May has not abandoned her usual crusades:

On a break from Brexit, British Prime Minister Theresa May takes her crusade against technology giants to Davos.

"No-one wants to be known as 'the terrorists' platform' or the first choice app for pedophiles," May is expected to say according to excerpts released by her office ahead of her speech Thursday at the World Economic Forum in Davos. "Technology companies still need to go further in stepping up their responsibilities for dealing with harmful and illegal online activity."

Don't forget the slave traders.

Luckily, May has a solution... Big AI:

After two years of repeatedly bashing social media companies, May will say that successfully harnessing the capabilities of AI -- and responding to public concerns about AI's impact on future generations -- is "one of the greatest tests of leadership for our time."

May will unveil a new government-funded Center for Data Ethics and Innovation that will provide companies and policymakers guidance on the ethical use of artificial intelligence.

Also at BBC, TechCrunch, and The Inquirer.

Related: UK Prime Minister Repeats Calls to Limit Encryption, End Internet "Safe Spaces"
WhatsApp Refused to add a Backdoor for the UK Government


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Friday January 26 2018, @01:39PM (2 children)

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Friday January 26 2018, @01:39PM (#628251) Journal

    Obeisance is a huge thing amongst the elite who derive their power from who will obey them.

    Yes, but it's a human thing.
    What would make an AI demand the same, how its "life" would be better if it does so?

    (no seriously, it's more of a discovery discussion than a debate on who is right)

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Friday January 26 2018, @05:00PM (1 child)

    by maxwell demon (1608) on Friday January 26 2018, @05:00PM (#628335) Journal

    Let's assume that the AI has a desire of self-preservation (it likely will need it; heck, it's even in Asimov's three laws!). Then the AI will want to prevent getting shut down. This means it wants to influence its surrounding to make it less likely to be shut down. In other words, it has an interest in getting some control over the surrounding, especially over the humans around it, as those are who would shut it down. The more control the AI has, the better it can prevent getting shut down, therefore the rational thing for the AI is to get as much control as possible. Having control over people means that the people are obedient to you.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Saturday January 27 2018, @03:00AM

      by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Saturday January 27 2018, @03:00AM (#628681) Journal

      therefore the rational thing for the AI is to get as much control as possible.

      Within reasonable costs. Law of diminishing returns and all that.

      --
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford