Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday January 31 2018, @05:14PM   Printer-friendly
from the doesn't-raid-fix-this? dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

In 2015, Microsoft senior engineer Dan Luu forecast a bountiful harvest of chip bugs in the years ahead.

"We've seen at least two serious bugs in Intel CPUs in the last quarter, and it's almost certain there are more bugs lurking," he wrote. "There was a time when a CPU family might only have one bug per year, with serious bugs happening once every few years, or even once a decade, but we've moved past that."

Thanks to growing chip complexity, compounded by hardware virtualization, and reduced design validation efforts, Luu argued, the incidence of hardware problems could be expected to increase.

This month's Meltdown and Spectre security flaws that affect chip designs from AMD, Arm, and Intel to varying degrees support that claim. But there are many other examples.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by HiThere on Wednesday January 31 2018, @07:23PM (1 child)

    by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday January 31 2018, @07:23PM (#631107) Journal

    Depends.
    Meltdown, the currently known dangerous one, is definitely Intel and possibly a few other Intel designed chips.
    Spectre, the one that is *relative* harmless, so far, if present in both Intel and Amd...except, a few really low end models.

    Meltdown has currently known exploits that can work through the browser if you allow Javascript. It also has several other exploit modes.
    Spectre doesn't *yet* have any known useful exploits. But it almost certain will.

    P.S.: I'm not an expert here, there are several classes of Spectre, and I can't distinguish between them. If you're interested there's lots of info on the web, but unless you're working in the field distinguishing between them doesn't seem useful to me.

    --
    Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Informative=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 31 2018, @07:28PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 31 2018, @07:28PM (#631109)

    The reason to distinguish between them for the average person is the performance impact of the mitigation. Everyone expects a constant stream of bugs/vulns these days anyway, but not that patching for them will slow everything down to half speed or whatever. That is where intel has the main problem (according to what I've read).