SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the Evolved-Expendable-Launch-Vehicle...-made-with-reusable-boosters dept.
The U.S. Air Force will award five contracts for satellite launches later this year as part of its Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) program:
The U.S. Air Force announced plans to award space launch contracts later this year for five satellites that include some of the military's most sensitive big-ticket payloads.
The competition comes less than two years since SpaceX became a legitimate competitor in a market that used to be entirely owned by United Launch Alliance, a partnership of Lockheed Martin and The Boeing Company. If SpaceX is able to win at least one or two launches in this next round of contracts, it would further cement its standing as a market disruptor and set the stage for the company to win even more military work when the larger Falcon Heavy rocket gets certified to fly government payloads.
The Air Force on Wednesday released a final request for proposals for Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) launch services for two National Reconnaissance Office payloads, the fifth Space-Based Infrared System geosynchronous Earth orbit satellite, an Air Force Space Command mission dubbed AFSPC-44 and a secret surveillance mission code-named SilentBarker. Proposals are due April 16 and contracts are expected to be awarded in late 2018.
The Air Force recently stated that they "did not identify any information that would change SpaceX's Falcon 9 certification status" despite the recent failure of a secret "Zuma" payload to separate from a Falcon 9 rocket.
SpaceX, which is behind schedule in building a new launch facility at Boca Chica beach near Brownsville, Texas, has requested $5 million in additional funding from state lawmakers:
SpaceX isn't talking, but a state representative said the company's request for additional state funds could point to an expansion of SpaceX's plans for its Boca Chica Beach launch site.
[...] Hawthorne, Calif.-based SpaceX broke ground on its Boca Chica Beach launch site 23 miles east of Brownsville in September 2014, with the first launch initially targeted for 2016. Later it was discovered that the site required stabilization, and the company trucked in 310,000 cubic yards of soil over months. Development also has been slowed by the company's focus on repairing and refurbishing its Cape Canaveral launch site that was damaged by an explosion in September 2016.
[The Falcon Heavy • Demo Flight is currently scheduled for Tuesday February 6 with a launch window of 1830-2130 UTC (1:30-4:30 p.m. EST) from launch site LC-39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida. --Ed.]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 02 2018, @06:32PM (2 children)
...despite the recent failure of a secret "Zuma" payload to separate from a Falcon 9 rocket..
What failure? No one knows if it is a failure. And if zuma did not separate, it is not the fault of Falcon 9, as it has been repeated ad nauseam all over the internet. The possibility that the author of the article somehow missed this is zero, imo.
And what is this about "behind schedule"? It is totally irrelevant. So, the construction of a structure in Texas is delayed. So what? Does this somehow prevents SpaceX to compete for one or more launches?
This is fear uncertainty and doubt.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 02 2018, @07:16PM (1 child)
Wow, and I thought I was a SpaceX fanboy.
Originally I was going to post that Northrup Grumman was responsible for fucking up the payload adapter but it's not super relevant. The point of mentioning Zuma at all is to show that the Air Force is still confident in the operation of the Falcon 9 rocket despite the all-but-confirmed loss of a $1+ billion spy satellite that was lifted by a Falcon 9. Air Force is indirectly telling us that SpaceX is not to blame. It is a pro-SpaceX line.
But apparently I can't state something factual about their Texas facility without it being called FUD. Or are you another hater of multiple stories in one and the semicolon?
- t
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 02 2018, @09:46PM
One dollar plus a billion satellites??? What kind of contracts are the Air Force writing anyway??