Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Friday February 02 2018, @10:22PM   Printer-friendly
from the c'est-vrai dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

[...] When I first got interested in the subject, in the mid-1970s, I ran across a letter written in 1947 by the mathematician Warren Weaver, an early machine-translation advocate, to Norbert Wiener, a key figure in cybernetics, in which Weaver made this curious claim, today quite famous:

When I look at an article in Russian, I say, "This is really written in English, but it has been coded in some strange symbols. I will now proceed to decode."

[...] The practical utility of Google Translate and similar technologies is undeniable, and probably it's a good thing overall, but there is still something deeply lacking in the approach, which is conveyed by a single word: understanding. Machine translation has never focused on understanding language. Instead, the field has always tried to "decode"—to get away without worrying about what understanding and meaning are. Could it in fact be that understanding isn't needed in order to translate well? Could an entity, human or machine, do high-quality translation without paying attention to what language is all about? To shed some light on this question, I turn now to the experiments I made.

It is a bit on the long side but Douglas Hofstadter very clearly exposes what language translation is and that Google Translate does not do it that way

Source: The Shallowness of Google Translate


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 03 2018, @04:14PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 03 2018, @04:14PM (#632565)

    All of those other interpretations require willfully ignoring the text and making random substitutions that aren't going to make sense.

    Most likely that sentence would be from a gaming site and it's pretty fucking clear that the intention is to wipe out the boss as none of those other possibilities would make sense in that context and the sentence at large doesn't make sense in other contexts.

    This kind of thing is something I see from a lot of people trying to push proper grammar and spelling, it's always contrived and only rarely is it a valid observation, In this case, any native speaker that doesn't know what was meant from the context probably has some sort of learning disorder.