Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Saturday February 03 2018, @12:02AM   Printer-friendly
from the echoes-of-Bosnia,-Iraq-et-al dept.

Scores of Rohingya villagers in Myanmar have been massacred and buried in 5 mass graves, according to an exclusive investigation by the Associated Press news agency.

The report by the news agency on Thursday includes witness testimony from two dozen survivors and relatives of victims, as well as time-stamped mobile phone footage of the aftermath of the attack.

Estimates suggest 400 members of the persecuted minority were killed by Burmese troops.

In one massacre, a group of men were picking teams for a local football-like game called 'chinlone' in the village of Gu Dar Pyin, when soldiers began firing at them.

A survivor named Noor Kadir later found six of his friends buried in two separate mass graves. He said the bodies of the victims were only recogniseable through the colour of their shorts.

The mass killing is believed to have taken place on August 27 and survivors told the Associated Press that soldiers had tried to cover up evidence of the atrocity.

Video obtained by the agency indicates attempts at using acid to remove the bodies.

[...]

Widely regarded as one of the most persecuted minorities in the world, the mainly Muslim Rohingya people, are denied citizenship by the Burmese government, which claims they are not native to Myanmar.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by cubancigar11 on Saturday February 03 2018, @05:51AM (10 children)

    by cubancigar11 (330) on Saturday February 03 2018, @05:51AM (#632382) Homepage Journal

    Being familiar with that part of the world, the problem is slightly more complicated than "Mooslems" and "Buddhists".


    So basically all over the world wherever Islam went it's domination was complete. Just like Christianity, Islam helped establish a common identity and create a sense of nationalism among its adherents. Any non-believers (just like in Christianity), were systematically driven out from all the "shared" resources. The whole notion of Nation is basically an umbrella concept to hold other identities such as shared religion, shared language, shared norms and mores etc.

    But India became a problem for Islam because India already had a notion of shared identity through its religion Hinduism. The thing about Hinduism is that its definition is so loose, anyone can start calling himself a Hindu and there is no way anyone can prove it otherwise. So Islam had a big trouble in dominating India. Through sheer perseverance and due to the fact Afghanistan has always been sparsely populated, it was quite successful. As it reached Pakistan, it met huge resistance through hardened fighters of that area called Rajputs. To cut long story short, the Muslims rulers, over generations, finally decided that it is simply easier to stop converting their subjects into Islam if they want to continue to rule. They made peace and alliances with Hindu rulers and basically maintained a lavish lifestyle by only focusing on taxes and maintenance of army. This is the advent of Mughal empire.

    Muslims clerics hated this progress that can best be described as 'church-state separation' for Muslim rulers of India. The more moderate voices of Islam (such as Sufis) got room, though. They went around and converted the poor Hindus, untouchables, and lower castes. It was a social upliftment for these poor people, but they still carry, to this day, the burden of their origin. In short, what happened was that Islam in India unknowingly imported casteism.

    So when British came, they dug all this history and then taught it to their bureaucrats. Now Britain is tiny tiny small country with a population that can be run over with a horde of horses, so they hired loyal-to-the-crown Indians for bureaucratic positions.

    Fast-forward to 1947, when British were leaving, they basically handed over all this shit to their bureaucrats. These bureaucrats fashioned themselves as the original rulers of India. For Muslims, that meant "carrying-on the torch of Islamic conversion" and purging the moderate voices. For that the British carved out Pakistan (and later, Bangladesh). This is what is happening there. For the rest of the India, moderate voice of Hindus won over the hardliners and Nehru fashioned himself as a British crown instead of any pre-British-Raj era Hindu ruler. So you see India has democracy, for certain definition of democracy. That's all the history of ruling class.

    Bangladesh is still having an internal power struggle between hardliner Muslims who think they are superior as they are descendants of original Muslims invaders, and the people who identify as native Muslims. The poor class has become basically a football that gets labeled as per convenience and kicked around everywhere. This has caused massive immigration to India over many decades that was tacitly supported by communist governments in neighboring Indian states, as well as Burma which was going through civil upheaval.

    That upheaval has ended, though. Recently, India has gotten a new Prime Minister [youtube.com] who panders to the hardliner Hindus and is totally against Muslim immigration. Since India has always supported Aung San Suu Kyi [wikipedia.org] over military rule of Burma, together they are creating a stronger "nation" - and that means kicking out the "foreigners". So the poor Muslims who had run away from Bangladesh, and suddenly finding the "foreign" lands even more hostile.

    TL;DR Religion is only very peripherally related to all this ethnic cleansing.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Interesting=2, Informative=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 03 2018, @07:11AM (9 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 03 2018, @07:11AM (#632397)

    Two bugbears driving this problem that neither mainstream media nor social media are willing to touch are overpopulation and climate change.

    Climate change is not a big deal -- yet. However, Bangladesh will be washed away under water withing a few decades and everyone there will swarm into neighboring countries, not just the kicked-around underclass now known as Rohingya Brand (tm) moslems. I'm not sure of a sensible solution. The likely an primitive solution would be to move troops and ammo to the borders of India and set up towers with overlapping fields of fire.

    Overpopulation is already a big deal here and now. Both the original, hard-liner moslem invaders and the kicked-around Rohingya Brand (tm) moslems have enormous numbers of children. It's one of the larger reasons why they are pressured out of Bangladesh and come into India and Myanmar as illegal squatters, armed insurgents, and violent militants. Bangladeshis have been illegally entering Myanmar for decades. Just because Bangladesh is completely unwilling to control its population growth does not give it any right whatsoever to annex Myanmar.

    The news just barely mentions this, but has nevertheless has covered it for decades. Myanmar has every right to the integrity of its own borders. Social media does not want to touch that fact. However, once the insurgents became successfully rebranded in social media as Rohingya Brand (tm) moslems, the history and context are thrown out. You have to stop and think where that is coming from and who controls which narratives are approved on social media. Saudi, Qatar, and the others have been investing heavily in both mainstream media and social media. They have already been getting their money's worth by keeping discourse on-message...

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 03 2018, @08:11AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 03 2018, @08:11AM (#632409)

      Climate change is not a big deal -- yet. However, Bangladesh will be washed away under water withing a few decades...

      No it won't. Real planet Earth is a bit more complicated than the oversimplification they use for scaremongering.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bay_of_Bengal#Rivers [wikipedia.org]
      "The Padma–Meghna-Jamuna rivers deposit nearly 1000 million tons of sediment every year."
      Which is about 700 cubic kilometers; enough to cover 18000 square km with a meter-thick layer. Or alternately, to raise the whole of Bangladeshi 147,610 sq.km 12 cm per year.
      https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bangladesh-clmate-land-idUSKCN0R90U220150909 [reuters.com]

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 03 2018, @08:54AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 03 2018, @08:54AM (#632425)

        That billion tons is only about 0.3 cubic kilometres, and only 2 mm per year per the entirety of Bangladesh. Still, enough to raise the coastal areas faster than the ocean level rises.

    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by cubancigar11 on Saturday February 03 2018, @09:59AM

      by cubancigar11 (330) on Saturday February 03 2018, @09:59AM (#632444) Homepage Journal

      Overpopulation is a well studied problem. Government has got nothing to do with it. Of course, tyranny can achieve anything, but Bangladesh is not China, neither are India or Burma - all three are suffering from population control.

      There is this problem people keep overlooking. Humans in all overpopulated areas of the world aren't suddenly having more than average children, you know! They are having exactly the same of number of children as allowed by biology over billions of years. There is no 'extra' fucking around going on, no matter what meme-lords say. And there is no reason why anyone can ask them to have less fucking than the rich people. Overpopulation happens because of decreasing death rate, which in turn happens due to advent of medicinal science, especially because of anti-biotics. Study says that it takes 3 generations from a decrease of death rate (which increases population) to self-regulated family control (which stabilizes population). That is the minimum.

      Further complication is that family control is directly proportional to economic stability. So now you need to control both the doctors and businessmen to achieve a stable population. Guess what, it took The West 300 years to do that. China did that in decades because simply a very good planning and a will to achieve lofty goals at the cost of human life. India still doesn't have economy under control, but its population has been tapering lately.

      So you are right in a way that Bangladeshi government is at fault, but it is not because of their unwillingness, but rather incompetence.

    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday February 03 2018, @12:37PM (5 children)

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Saturday February 03 2018, @12:37PM (#632501) Journal

      Just because Bangladesh is completely unwilling to control its population growth does not give it any right whatsoever to annex Myanmar.

      Bullshit [google.com]. Bangladesh's population growth rate has dropped to 1.1% which is actually below the global population growth rate right now. It used to be over 2.8% in the 1970s and 1980s.

      What other excuses are you going to come up with for murdering innocent people?

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 03 2018, @03:10PM (2 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 03 2018, @03:10PM (#632544)

        Khallow, you're always the liar. Bangladesh's population is still growing [worldometers.info] and has been since record keeping started. Only the excessive birthrate has reduced. How far are you going to bend reality to advance the cause of illegal squatters, armed insurgents, and violent militants just to cause the deaths of innocent Burmese?

        Burma has every right to the integrity of its own borders and nothing you can write gives Bangladesh any right to annex Burma.

        What was done in the past to Bangladesh and Afghanistan is now happening to Burma. Except now social media is here to back the invaders.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 03 2018, @05:11PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 03 2018, @05:11PM (#632595)

          He just said the growth rate is 1.1%.

        • (Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday February 03 2018, @09:11PM

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Saturday February 03 2018, @09:11PM (#632668) Journal

          Khallow, you're always the liar. Bangladesh's population is still growing and has been since record keeping started.

          As the AC replier noted, I didn't say any different. 1.1% is greater than 0%. I can't help but notice what passes for a thought process here. I said something you disagreed with, therefore I must be lying. Well truth is an absolute defense against bullshit accusations of lying, buttercup. Read the posts next time. Don't waste my time with your bullshit.

          Only the excessive birthrate has reduced.

          And that's what's important here. That great reduction in population growth addresses the very complaint of the previous AC poster. Bangladesh is well on track to reach 0% growth, perhaps in half a century, maybe less.

          Burma has every right to the integrity of its own borders and nothing you can write gives Bangladesh any right to annex Burma.

          No, they don't. Murdering thousands of people crosses that line. And Bangladesh isn't trying to annex anyone.

          What was done in the past to Bangladesh and Afghanistan is now happening to Burma. Except now social media is here to back the invaders.

          These murders go the wrong way for your little fairy tale.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 03 2018, @03:20PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 03 2018, @03:20PM (#632547)

        Rohingya Brand (tm) moslem squatters, insurgents, and militants have very large families sometimes up to 20 [aljazeera.com]. No matter how you slice it, that is part of the problem.

        • (Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday February 03 2018, @09:15PM

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Saturday February 03 2018, @09:15PM (#632671) Journal

          Rohingya Brand (tm) moslem squatters, insurgents, and militants have very large families sometimes up to 20. No matter how you slice it, that is part of the problem.

          Interesting how you can't just call them people. Anyway, let's draw your attention to this quote from your linked story:

          Bangladesh is planning to introduce voluntary sterilisation of Rohingya refugees, nearly a million of whom have been staying in overcrowded camps in Cox's Bazar district near Myanmar border.

          Pintu Kanti Bhattacharjee, who heads the family planning service in the district of Cox's Bazar, said on Saturday that there was little awareness of birth control among the Rohingya.

          "The whole community has been deliberately left behind," Bhattacharjee added, citing a lack of education in Myanmar, where the Rohingya are viewed as illegal inhabitants and denied access to most services.

          Notice that Bangladesh manned up and introduced birth control technology and education to these refugees while Myanmar deliberately made the problem worse.