Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Saturday February 03 2018, @12:09PM   Printer-friendly
from the si-un-maya-se-desmaya-sigue-siendo-maya? dept.

'Game Changer': Maya Cities Unearthed In Guatemala Forest Using Lasers

By raining down laser pulses on some 770 square miles of dense forest in northern Guatemala, archaeologists have discovered 60,000 Maya structures that make up full sprawling cities.

And the new technology provides them with an unprecedented view into how the ancient civilization worked, revealing almost industrial agricultural infrastructure and new insights into Maya warfare.

"This is a game changer," says Thomas Garrison, an archaeologist at Ithaca College who is one of the leaders of the project. It changes "the base level at which we do Maya archaeology."

The data reveals that the area was three or four times more densely populated than originally thought. "I mean, we're talking about millions of people, conservatively," says Garrison. "Probably more than 10 million people."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 03 2018, @09:07PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 03 2018, @09:07PM (#632666)

    For instance, Amazon groups are linked with indigenous Australians [smithsonianmag.com]

    Perhaps you're also not aware that we don't even know exactly who the ancient Egyptians were; it has been a topic of debate. [wikipedia.org] Recent tests of mummies indicate connections with Middle Easterners and Europeans>/a>. [cnn.com]

    Look at you speaking with such smug confidence, when you clearly know jack shit! Ha! I love it!

  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday February 04 2018, @03:46AM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Sunday February 04 2018, @03:46AM (#632777) Journal
    And yet, still no genetic evidence to support the global civilization claim. I wasn't claiming that there wasn't some genetic movement and interaction. But your links show much less than you think. The South American example merely shows some common genetic source, maybe, between Australia aboriginals and some South American Amazon tribes. They can't even show that it happened before 1500 AD (though it is thought to be "fairly old"). Meanwhile, what exactly is supposed to be significant about a particular population of Egyptians having common genetic basis with nearby Europeans and Middle East populations? Not evidence of a global extent.

    The glaring thing missing here is a global genetic signal. If there was any sort of cultural, knowledge, or economic exchange at the global level, there should be gene groups manifesting at the global level. That's just how people operate. There is not.