Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Saturday February 03 2018, @06:21PM   Printer-friendly
from the cutting-edge dept.

These Tools Upend Our View of Stone-Age Humans in Asia

Long ago in what's now southern India, early humans showed a knack for disruption that would've made Silicon Valley tech wizards envious. Over time, the ancient innovators rejected bulky hand-axes and cleavers, instead opting for sleek flakes of stone meant for cutting and tipping spears.

Similar disruptions occurred in Africa among the forebears of modern humans around the same time. But the timing of the Indian transition, spotted in the soil layers of a site called Attirampakkam, is eye-popping. At 250,000 years old—and possibly up to 385,000 years old—this tool transition occurred far earlier than it did at other sites in India.

The discovery, described in Nature on Wednesday [DOI: 10.1038/nature25444] [DX], pushes back the start of what's called the Middle Paleolithic culture in the region by more than a hundred thousand years. That, in turn, could reshape how scientists view the global spread of hominins—humans and their ancient relatives—before modern humans migrated out of Africa some 60,000 years ago.

Also at The Verge.

Related: Earliest Human Remains Outside of Africa Discovered


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by takyon on Saturday February 03 2018, @11:42PM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Saturday February 03 2018, @11:42PM (#632714) Journal

    The DOI is always useful. You can put it in a search engine, and even use it to look up and pirate the paper cough cough.

    I put (DOI: 10....) when the article is paywalled, and (open, DOI: 10....) when it is freely available.

    As for the DX link, someone complained about me linking to the current direct URL of the paper, which could be subject to change. The DX link links to dx.doi.org/10.blahblah or doi.org/10.blahblah which should redirect to the correct location no matter what (in theory).

    If there is an arXiv link for a paywalled paper, and I notice it, I will throw that in beside all that other stuff. There isn't an automatic way to find this out since arXiv isn't linked to the final form of the paper in any database I know of.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Informative=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4