The Guardian writes how tech insiders give their own products a wide berth. The reason is in the design of these services.
I am a compulsive social media user. I have sent about 140,000 tweets since I joined Twitter in April 2007 – six Jacks' worth. I use Instagram, Snapchat and Reddit daily. I have accounts on Ello, Peach and Mastodon (remember them? No? Don't worry). Three years ago, I managed to quit Facebook. I went cold turkey, deleting my account in a moment of lucidity about how it made me feel and act. I have never regretted it, but I haven't been able to pull the same stunt twice.
I used to look at the heads of the social networks and get annoyed that they didn't understand their own sites. Regular users encounter bugs, abuse or bad design decisions that the executives could never understand without using the sites themselves. How, I would wonder, could they build the best service possible if they didn't use their networks like normal people?
Now, I wonder something else: what do they know that we don't?
Apparently what's good for the goose isn't good for the gander.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 05 2018, @06:22AM
You can't convince me to become a digital whore. Not even a great try.
Besides, it's not your name and picture social media really wants but your interaction. And that nobody can give them except you.