Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.

Cracking Suspect Lauri Love Wins Appeal Against Extradition to US

posted by takyon on Monday February 05 2018, @07:11PM   Printer-friendly
from the case-cracked dept.

canopic jug writes:

The UK high court has finally ruled on the extradition of Lauri Love, the Finnish-British student accused of cracking U.S. government websites. He will not be extradited to face trial in America. The court accepted both of the main arguments that there is no reason he cannot not be tried in England and that he might suffer serious damage to his health if he were extradited.

Source: Hacking Suspect Lauri Love Wins Appeal Against Extradition to US

Previously: Lauri Love to be Extradited to the U.S.
Lauri Love's Appeal Will be Heard in the UK on November 28th and 29th

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Cracking Suspect Lauri Love Wins Appeal Against Extradition to US | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 44 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 06 2018, @06:37PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 06 2018, @06:37PM (#634010)

    Committing crimes on US soil, even when you're in another country when you do it

    Nope, you can't have it both ways. How can one both "commit a crime on US soil" and "not be in the country"?

    You could also say that the DoD was negligent in exposing its data to other countries, and that this particular freedom fighter just picked it up in England.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Total Score:   1  

  • (Score: 1, Disagree) by khallow on Tuesday February 06 2018, @07:08PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday February 06 2018, @07:08PM (#634035) Journal

    Nope, you can't have it both ways. How can one both "commit a crime on US soil" and "not be in the country"?

    How can you ask that question when the story just demonstrated how it can be done. Computer networks allow you to commit crimes at a distance.

    You could also say that the DoD was negligent in exposing its data to other countries, and that this particular freedom fighter just picked it up in England.

    Blaming the victim. Modest degrees of negligence don't excuse crimes. You need something pretty epic, like Trump non-sarcastically inviting the world's hackers to give it a try or the DoD never persecuting computer intrusions for decades.