Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Tuesday February 06 2018, @03:01AM   Printer-friendly
from the Trouble-In-Bitcoin-City dept.

An article on Ars Technica notes the continuing slide downward of Bitcoin prices (down below $9,000 per coin from a December peak of $19,500). It also notes some recent news about Facebook ads and crypto, SEC Action against a different cryptocurrency project, and rumors about a still different coin's possibility of insolvency.

Meanwhile, rumors are swirling about Tether, a cryptocurrency whose value is pegged to the United States dollar. Tethers are supposed to be redeemable for dollars at any time, but in recent months Tether has struggled to gain access to the conventional banking system and has failed to produce a financial audit demonstrating its solvency.

I'm not sure if the article is connecting unconnected stories of problems or if the theme of trouble in crypto-land generally is valid. But this quote got me to thinking how much the state of cryptocurrency may be like the Free Banking Era in the United States in the 1800s and the Wildcat Banking that signaled its demise. We discuss cryptocurrency a lot on Soylent, but are the troubles of various operators all linked or is it unrelated coincidence?

[Ed. Note: The linked story at Ars Technica was updated to report that the price of one BitCoin dropped below $7000. As of this writing, coinbase reports the price dropped to about $6400 (Javascript required). Note this price is still $5500 ahead of where it was this time last year when it had just inched above $1000.]


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 06 2018, @05:37AM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 06 2018, @05:37AM (#633649)

    gold and silver have value because they don't degrade.
    "noble" metals they are called, because they generally don't do chemical reactions.
    this makes them ideal for coins because the coin won't change much over a hundred years or so.

  • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Tuesday February 06 2018, @07:44AM

    by maxwell demon (1608) on Tuesday February 06 2018, @07:44AM (#633681) Journal

    Of course numbers don't degrade either. The medium they are stored on can, of course, but you can back it up. If you desire so, you can even engrave your offline wallet in stone.

    However, unlike gold, you'll need a working infrastructure (electricity, internet) to spend your bitcoins.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  • (Score: 2) by Thexalon on Tuesday February 06 2018, @01:04PM (1 child)

    by Thexalon (636) on Tuesday February 06 2018, @01:04PM (#633788)

    this makes them ideal for coins because the coin won't change much over a hundred years or so.

    Except of course for nobody hanging onto actual coins for over a century. The Romans, for instance, had fairly sophisticated banking systems, which meant the rich folks didn't have to actually lug around hard cash when they, for instance, went to Egypt to conduct business.

    --
    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 06 2018, @02:30PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 06 2018, @02:30PM (#633826)

      the point is that it's a reasonably small thing that can be easily exchanged between people, and it will stay more or less the same for generations.

      and you can make a crown from gold and then it will be the same crown "forever". as well as various religious stuff.