Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday February 07 2018, @10:28AM   Printer-friendly
from the how-do-you-test-its-effectiveness? dept.

"Biohackers" are growing bolder with their self-experimentation:

Aaron Traywick, 28, who leads biotech firm Ascendance Biomedical, used an experimental herpes treatment that did not go through the typical route of clinical trials to test its safety. Instead of being developed by research scientists in laboratories, it was created by a biohacker named Andreas Stuermer, who "holds a masters degree and is a bioentrepreneur and science lover," according to a conference bio. This is typical of the Ascendance approach. The company believes that FDA regulations for developing treatments are too slow and that having biohackers do the research and experiment on themselves can speed up the process to everyone's benefit. In the past, the company's plans have included trying to reverse menopause, a method that is now actually in clinical trials.

"We prefer to do everything before a live audience so you can hold us accountable in the days to come as we collect the data to prove whether or not this works," Traywick said before last night's spectacle. And, he added, "if we succeed with herpes in even the most minor ways, we can move forward immediately with cancer."

Despite specifying that he wanted "technical questions," someone in the audience asked whether Ascendance had received ethical permission for the experiment. Traywick said he didn't. Technically, everything has been officially labeled "not for human consumption," he said.

Also at The Scientist.

Related: Gene Therapy to Kill Cancer Moves a Step Closer to Market
Biohackers Disregard FDA Warning on DIY Gene Therapy


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by aristarchus on Wednesday February 07 2018, @06:31PM

    by aristarchus (2645) on Wednesday February 07 2018, @06:31PM (#634484) Journal

    If you are willing to experiment on yourself, you are a bit too invested emotionally in your research. Confirmation bias? Hard to do a double-blind trial with just me, myself, and I. Even moreso in front of cameras. So it is bad science, very bad. And if the "researcher" in question is subjecting him or her self to dangers that no rational person would consent to risk, we might invite this very smart science lover to a select research institute where the greatest minds in the world are free to pursue their ground-breaking research free of government interference (but bound by "I love me" jackets, padded cells, and liberal non-therapuetic drugs).

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4