Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday February 12 2018, @11:55AM   Printer-friendly
from the planned^Wscheduled-obsolescence dept.

Sonos, the consumer electronics company known for audio streaming and "smart" speakers, has decided that the music controller device, the "CR100", has reached end of life. By which they mean they will be pushing a software upgrade that will kill it.

... the next Sonos update in early April will turn off the CR100 connection -- unless you decide you don't want any updates at all. (Make sure you set that up in advance -- if you accept the update, you can't undo it and go back to using the old controller.)

That means if you want to keep on using a device you're happy with, you have to give up all the new features on all your Sonos speakers.

The company says its primary concern is the age of the lithium ion batteries in the controllers; although in that case an official device recall would be better than an update that stops them working - and a battery replacement scheme would handle the problem just as well.

Although the controller is old (Sonos stopped selling the CR100 in 2009) it is still perfectly functional for many users. However, according to a forum posting explaining the options these users will have to choose between the CR100 and the functionality of the rest of their system:

... opting not to update means you will not receive any new features or future security patches for your entire system – not just the CR100. For example, being on an unsupported version means that you might lose connectivity to music services, as is already the case for Google Play Music on the CR100. It is necessary to configure your system in advance to avoid future updates. Any update applied to the firmware and/or to the app, even unintentionally, is irreversible.

Originally spotted on The EEV Blog Youtube channel.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by stretch611 on Monday February 12 2018, @04:08PM (4 children)

    by stretch611 (6199) on Monday February 12 2018, @04:08PM (#636721)

    Class action lawsuit.

    Assuming that you didn't throw your rights away clicking through an EULA.

    --
    Now with 5 covid vaccine shots/boosters altering my DNA :P
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by Arik on Monday February 12 2018, @05:18PM (2 children)

    by Arik (4543) on Monday February 12 2018, @05:18PM (#636738) Journal
    Inalienable rights are inalienable, click-throughs fail every test of informed consent.

    The best thing that could happen here would be a lawsuit that bankrupts the bastards. Burn their buildings, sow their fields with salt, they deserve no less.
    --
    If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 12 2018, @06:54PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 12 2018, @06:54PM (#636774)

      Burn their buildings, sow their fields with salt...

      I would prefer to just move into their house and fuck the maid.

      • (Score: 1) by Arik on Monday February 12 2018, @07:12PM

        by Arik (4543) on Monday February 12 2018, @07:12PM (#636785) Journal
        Err, have you *seen* the maid?

        >><<
        --
        If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by HiThere on Monday February 12 2018, @05:28PM

    by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Monday February 12 2018, @05:28PM (#636741) Journal

    One of the purposes of an EULA is to convince you that you've signed away rights that the local laws don't allow to be signed away.

    Don't believe the EULA. They'll throw in anything that might convince you that you can't stop them. Perhaps it's right, but it doesn't need to be, and often isn't.

    OTOH, also don't believe that just because it's abusive, it can't be enforced. Sometimes it can. And it differs by locality. If you really need to know, check with a local lawyer...preferably one who specialized in that kind of issue...and remember, the lawyer can only give you their opinion as to how the judge is likely to decide.

    I, personally, prefer to refuse to purchase items with abusive EULAs...but one can't avoid them when purchasing necessities with limited suppliers. Just read the ER EULA some time.

    --
    Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.