Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday February 16 2018, @01:53AM   Printer-friendly
from the screw-you dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

Humans easily outperform machines when it comes to tightening and loosening screw fasteners. The future of manufacturing and recycling may depend on changing that.

In the pantheon of technologies that make our modern society possible, one of the most underappreciated and neglected is the threaded fastener, more commonly known as the screw. This technology emerged at the dawn of the industrial era, when it became possible to make metal gadgets like these on a large scale.

Today, these devices literally hold the world together. Our 21st-century lifestyles would not be possible without them, and they are likely to play an indispensable role for the foreseeable future.

Yet in a world where manufacturing techniques are increasingly automated, there is a problem. The process of screwing and unscrewing is still one in which humans outperform machines. Robotic devices have difficulty locating screws and their sockets and then manipulating screws and screwdrivers effectively.

[...] These researchers are part of a team building robots that can take apart electronic devices, like smartphones, for recycling. The project is called RecyBot, and its goal is to create a high-speed intelligent robotic system for dismantling electronics.

That's a considerable challenge, and one of the biggest headaches is unscrewing. So the team at least have this under their belt. But the same technology could be applied in a wide range of smart factories that have to assemble and disassemble components.

Source: https://www.hardocp.com/news/2018/02/13/humans_screw_much_better_than_killer_robots/

Source: Haptics of Screwing and Unscrewing for its Application in Smart Factories for Disassembly


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 16 2018, @03:43AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 16 2018, @03:43AM (#638641)

    UBI is simple if you only look at automation and plain people. When you take into account those other people that own the robots... things are far from simple. Otherwise those owners would be already pushing for UBI instead of buying houses in NZ.

    Basically, I agree with you. But I doubt any of us are robot owners.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2