Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday February 16 2018, @05:07AM   Printer-friendly
from the all-those-in-favour,-please-cough dept.

Austria has one of the highest rates of smoking and youth smoking among high income countries, and that might not be changing anytime soon:

Many Western countries have banned smoking in bars and restaurants, but Austria is bucking that trend. Under a law passed in 2015, Austria was due to bring in a total ban this May, but now its new government of the conservatives and the far-right Freedom Party have scrapped the plans.

The move was spearheaded by the leader of the Freedom Party, Austria's Vice Chancellor Heinz-Christian Strache, himself a smoker, who told parliament last month that it was about freedom of choice. He said restaurants should be free to decide if they want to have smoking sections, where "a citizen has the possibility to decide perhaps to enjoy a cigarette or a pipe or a cigar with their coffee".

The move has horrified Austria's medical establishment. Dr Manfred Neuberger, professor emeritus at the Medical University of Vienna, says it is "a public health disaster".

"The decision is irresponsible. It was a victory for the tobacco industry. The new government made Austria into the ashtray of Europe."

Meanwhile, the country is considering buying more jet fighters, recruiting more police, defunding its public broadcaster, and examining its past.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 16 2018, @06:50AM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 16 2018, @06:50AM (#638715)
    Because unlike consumption of carbonated drinks or fatty foods, or lack of exercise, cigarette smoking affects not only you, but the people around you as well. There's that old canard about your freedom to swing your fist stops at my face, well, your freedom to smoke ends where your smoke reaches my face too. Even if you're a non-smoker, being around smokers all the time (such as being married to one, or working in places where one is constantly exposed to cigarette smoke like in a pub or bar) affects you at least as much as if you smoked yourself. The harmful effects of passive smoke are real and a matter of scientific consensus [ahajournals.org]. By the way, governments have for the most part never seriously tried to ban the importation, manufacture, or use of tobacco products, but only sought to regulate the places where you can consume them, and to tax them largely in proportion to the health care costs that are attributed to smoking. I don't think there is any place in the world where you would be punished for smoking in the privacy of your own home, for instance.
    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +5  
       Insightful=5, Total=5
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Friday February 16 2018, @07:25AM (2 children)

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Friday February 16 2018, @07:25AM (#638732) Journal

    and to tax them largely in proportion to the health care costs that are attributed to smoking

    My experience tells me there's no relation between the health care cost of smoking and the excise the Australian govt imposes on tobacco. If any, there seems to be an actual inverse correlation: the less Australians smoke, the higher the excises.

    More likely, the direct relation between the ciggies taxes is with the level of desperation of the govt of the day to reduce the budget deficit.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 16 2018, @10:03AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 16 2018, @10:03AM (#638759)

      They say that they use the proceeds of the ciggy tax to fund antismoking campaigns and support the additional load smoking adds to the public health system

      • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Friday February 16 2018, @10:16AM

        by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Friday February 16 2018, @10:16AM (#638763) Journal

        They say that they use the proceeds of the ciggy tax to fund antismoking campaigns and support the additional load smoking adds to the public health system

        LMFAO... That's bullshit and I know it. [youtube.com]

        --
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
  • (Score: 2) by dry on Friday February 16 2018, @11:05PM

    by dry (223) on Friday February 16 2018, @11:05PM (#639101) Journal

    There is also the problems of various perfumes that people wear, often in huge amounts as they've de-sensitived themselves to it, that make other people sick.