Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday February 22 2018, @10:49PM   Printer-friendly
from the choose-wisely dept.

Both Facebook and Netflix implemented their eponymous apps with Web. Despite spending millions of dollars, neither of them could achieve an iPhone-like user experience (60 frames per second and less than 100ms response to user inputs) on anything less powerful than a system-on-chip (SoC) with four ARM Cortex-A9 cores.

In contrast, numerous products like infotainment systems, in-flight entertainment systems, harvester terminals and home appliances prove that you can achieve an iPhone-like user experience (UX) on single-core Cortex-A8 SoCs. Our above-mentioned manufacturer HAM Inc. (renamed for the sake of confidentiality) verified these results by building both a Web and Qt prototype.

In this white paper, Burkhard Stubert explains how he could save one of the world's largest home appliance manufacturers millions of Euros by choosing Qt over HTML. The secret? Qt scales down to lower-end hardware a lot better, without sacrificing user experience.

With a five times smaller footprint, four to eight times lower RAM requirements and a more efficient rendering flow than HTML, Qt provides faster start-up times and maintains the cherished 60fps and 100ms response time, where HTML would struggle. The calculations show that being able to just downgrade your SoC by just one tier like this, Qt can reduce your hardware costs by over 53%.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 23 2018, @09:20AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 23 2018, @09:20AM (#642282)

    Space-X doesn't sell to us, to us they are just cool stuff.

    Health-related stories are usually either negative or so far in the future that it can't be considered advertising anyway.

    The Tesla stories, though, might be taken as advertising by some.

  • (Score: 2) by unauthorized on Friday February 23 2018, @09:51AM (1 child)

    by unauthorized (3776) on Friday February 23 2018, @09:51AM (#642291)

    Brand awareness is a real advertisement strategy, and quite deplorable at that. Basically, they are trying to cramp their company/product name in everyone's heads by repeatedly putting their brand in your face everywhere you go. It is nothing short of deliberate attempts at brainwashing the public by exploiting the shared flaws of human cognition.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 23 2018, @12:00PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 23 2018, @12:00PM (#642327)

      If their product is actually better who cares?