SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the sounds-like-a-sci-fi-movie-plot dept.
NASA's Planetary Protection Officer has suggested that it's time to contaminate Mars slightly aggressively before humans arrive with their microbiomes in tow:
Is there life on the surface of Mars? The clock is ticking on scientists' window to solve that long-standing question before astronauts—and the microbes that live on them—contaminate the planet. Today, at a meeting in Washington, D.C., of NASA's planetary science advisory committee, the agency's new planetary protection officer raised the possibility of opening up a few of the planet's most promising regions to more aggressive exploration.
Just a few weeks into the job, Lisa Pratt, formerly a geomicrobiologist at Indiana University in Bloomington, has signaled that she wants the office to be open to the notion that a degree of contamination might be necessary to explore several of the planet's most habitable spots. Previously, the office has served as a watchdog to prevent the contamination of Mars and other planets with microbes from Earth, and vice versa. But now, time is pressing, given NASA's long-term goals, Pratt says. "No matter what we do, the minute we've got humans in the area we've got a less pristine, less clean state," Pratt said at the meeting. "Let's hope we know before the humans get there, one way or the other, if there is an ecosystem at or near the surface."
Although no region of Mars is banned for exploration, international treaties set the allowable levels of microbial contamination on robotic spacecraft destined for other planetary environments. Some scientists say it is too costly to meet the sterilization requirements to explore the potentially warm and wet "special regions" on Mars that are most likely to harbor microbes. Only the 1970s Viking landers achieved the cleanliness necessary to explore a special region. A growing number of scientists have argued that the agency needs to rethink its plans, as Science reported last year.
Related 2013 paper: The overprotection of Mars (DOI: 10.1038/ngeo1866) (DX)
Previously: NASA Posts Planetary Protection Officer Job Position
(Score: 2, Interesting) by khallow on Saturday February 24 2018, @03:02PM (7 children)
The problem is that some Earth life may well be better adapted than any Mars life to living on Mars. Let us keep in mind that chemical activity goes up with warmth over the ranges in which life can survive. That means a population of organisms which lives in a warmer climate can reproduce faster, breed larger populations per unit volume with greater competition, and hence, evolve faster than organisms in colder climates (and less available solar and geothermal energy). In particular, there would be a several billion year period in which Earth life would have evolved sophisticated cellular chemistry which hypothetical Mars life might not be able to match.
OTOH, maybe Martian life won the evolutionary lottery, and we should be worried about life going the other way. We'll just have to see.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 24 2018, @03:29PM (1 child)
Just send blankets with smallpox.
(Score: 2) by Wootery on Sunday February 25 2018, @06:15PM
A highly irresponsible suggestion. Smallpox is endangered!
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 24 2018, @03:57PM (4 children)
It sounds like global warming is generally good for life then.
(Score: 2) by JNCF on Saturday February 24 2018, @07:56PM
Heating ice is generally good for water. Heating water is generally good for steam. Equilibriums are tricky.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 24 2018, @11:43PM (1 child)
(Score: 1) by khallow on Monday February 26 2018, @10:06AM
There's not much point to the observation when we already know that humans can take those temperatures easily.
(Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Sunday February 25 2018, @08:08AM
Yeah, that's why life thrives in a boiling pot. ;-)
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.