Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Sunday February 25 2018, @01:11PM   Printer-friendly
from the vox-populi dept.

We had submissions from three Soylentils with different takes on the NRA (National Rifle Association) and the public response in the wake of an attack at a Parkland, Florida high school.

Public Outcry Convinces National Companies to Cut Ties with NRA

Common Dreams reports:

In the latest sign that the aftermath of the Parkland, Florida tragedy may be playing out differently than the fallout from other mass shootings, several national companies have cut ties with the National Rifle Association (NRA).

[Car rental companies] Alamo, Enterprise, and National--all owned by Enterprise Holdings--announced late on [February 22] that they would end discounts for the NRA's five million members. Symantec, the security software giant that owns Lifelock and Norton, ended its discount program on Friday as well.

The First National Bank of Omaha also said it would stop issuing its NRA-branded Visa credit cards, emblazoned with the group's logo and called "the Official Credit Card of the NRA". The institution is the largest privately-held bank in the U.S., with locations in Nebraska, Colorado, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, and South Dakota.

Additional coverage on TheHill, MarketWatch, Independent and Politico.

The NRA Just Awarded FCC Chair Ajit Pai With a Gun for His 'Courage'

FCC Chairman Ajit Pai joined the pack at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) on Friday alongside fellow Republican commissioners Michael O'Rielly and Brendan Carr—the architects of the recent order repealing net neutrality protections passed in the Obama era.

Upon taking the stage, it was announced that Pai was receiving an award from the National Rifle Association: a handmade Kentucky long gun and plaque known as the "Charlton Heston Courage Under Fire Award."

https://gizmodo.com/the-nra-just-awarded-fcc-chair-ajit-pai-with-a-gun-for-1823273450

These Companies are Sticking by the NRA

Fallout continues from the mass murder in Florida. The National Rifle Association is taking it up the wazoo. A national boycott is emerging. If you are old enough, you will remember that this is what brought down Apartheid in South Africa.

From the Huffington Post:

In what may be a pivotal moment for American gun law reform, the National Rifle Association has become the object of intense pushback from anti-gun activists and survivors of last week's mass shooting at a Florida high school that left 17 dead.

All the attention prompted the gun-rights group to break from its usual strategy of keeping quiet after mass gun deaths. NRA officials have gone on the attack to rail against the "politicization" of a tragedy, and going so far as to suggest that members of the media "love mass shootings" because of the ratings they supposedly bring.

The uproar has once again presented companies affiliated with the NRA, and its powerful pro-gun lobby, with a question: to cut ties, or to continue a relationship with a large but controversial group?

The NRA partners with dozens of businesses to spread its pro-gun message and provide discounts to its members, who number 5 million, according to the group. But this week, some companies have begun to jump ship.

Facing pressure from consumers, the First National Bank of Omaha said Thursday it would stop issuing NRA-branded Visa credit cards after its contract with the group expires. Enterprise Holdings, which operates the rental car brands Enterprise, National and Alamo, says it will end its discount program for NRA members next month, along with Avis and Budget. Hertz is out, too.


Original Submissions: #1, #2, and #3.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Sunday February 25 2018, @04:18PM (1 child)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday February 25 2018, @04:18PM (#643471) Journal

    Dead is dead. What's the difference if it was an accident, or intentional, to the dead person?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by tekk on Sunday February 25 2018, @06:43PM

    by tekk (5704) Subscriber Badge on Sunday February 25 2018, @06:43PM (#643511)

    I agree with Runaway for once? Weird. That was my point: if you want it to be apples to apples, compare the murders plus the manslaughters *plus* the ancillary accidental deaths (count your equivalent UK ancillary deaths too. Knife sharpening incidents? Shillelagh juggling mishaps? Whatever pepole in the UK are carrying for protection and equivalent sport.) Shot yourself while cleaning your gun, kd got your gun and killed their sibling while playing with it, that sort of stuff. Suicides are the biggest cause of death by gun, but I can understand not wanting to get into that because it'd be hard to say whether they would've attempted without a gun or been unsuccessful.

    Incidentally, this only counts the *license holders* not the people in houses with a gun present, so if your wife murders you with your gun, that's not a murder here. I'd also be open to them counting some manslaughters and murders by *illegal* gun owners. Most of those illegal guns, after all, are legal guns that were stolen, and so it'd naturally follow that reducing the number of legal guns reduces the number of illegal guns, there just aren't as many around to steal.

    I feel like this is where the talking past eachother thing kinda comes in.I'm not going to say that Western Free Press published it in bad faith, but there are different questions that are being answered. Gun control advocates say "Let's have fewer guns", pro gun people hear "...because gun owners do bad things" so the murder statistics of the people who legally are considered to be the owners of a gun are relevant and the others hear "...because having a highly armed populous does more overall harm to society than good" where the statistics of those gun owners is irrelevant, let's look at the larger impacts of having all these guns.