SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
In a recent interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network, Scott Pruitt, EPA Chief, said that the Bible tells people to use all the resources available to us, including fossil fuels:
"The biblical world view with respect to these issues is that we have a responsibility to manage and cultivate, harvest the natural resources that we've been blessed with to truly bless our fellow mankind".
According to Vox: "But as far as his biblical assertion goes, Pruitt's words reflect a wider trend among American evangelicals, who largely have not embraced scientific thought on environmentalism or global warming."
The Trump administration has used a variety of excuses to legitimize its record-setting rollbacks on environmental protections: calling global warming a hoax, or arguing that the economic consequences of increased regulation would outweigh their benefit.
The latest justification? The Bible.
In an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network, a media outlet that also seems to double as a propaganda arm of the Trump administration, Environmental Protection Agency chief Scott Pruitt said his Christian convictions led him to conclude that America should use gas and coal freely because natural resources exist purely for man's benefit.
[...] That's why evangelical groups have, therefore, been historically resistant to environmentalist causes. Creationist lobbying groups frequently fund initiatives like the Louisiana Science Education Act, which mandates a "balanced" (and climate change-denying) approach to teaching environmental issues in public schools.
Please read the linked article as it explains the connection between contempt for science and protecting the environment and the beliefs of evangelicals.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Thexalon on Monday February 26 2018, @06:36PM (1 child)
Regarding Homer's works, I think it's worth noting that they were elevated by many ancient Greeks to roughly the level of their holy texts. For example, when you read Plato's dialogues, written at least 300 years later, the philosophers are quoting the Iliad to each other in the same sort of tone Americans often use when quoting Genesis (the book, not Peter Gabriel). And the basic character of each of the deities involved pretty well matches the character they were given in their religious activities. Homer has a pretty good excuse, though, namely that the events he's writing about had occurred about 400 years earlier and been maintained only in oral tradition, so like all oral traditions there's sure to be some garbling, exaggeration, and mythifying real people. For classic fish-story changes, just look at how Homer describes the rocks that some of the warriors are chucking at their enemies.
As for the Bible's early stuff: There's a lot of evidence for the stories originating in Mesopotamian legend, originally collected into the Torah during the Babylonian captivity. As for the truth of it, the archaeology and records of neighboring civilizations such as the Egyptians mostly don't match up.
The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 27 2018, @04:30AM
Don't forget the gnome [wikipedia.org].