Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Monday February 26 2018, @02:59PM   Printer-friendly
from the limit-does-not-exist dept.

Original URL: US state legal supremos show lots of love for proposed CLOUD Act (a law to snoop on citizens' info stored abroad)

The attorneys general of 35 US states on Wednesday signed an open letter calling for the quick passage of the Clarify Lawful Overseas Use of Data (CLOUD) Act – with some qualifications.

[...] In effect, it means the FBI can ask, say, a California court for a subpoena to obtain files from a San Francisco upstart's servers hosted in France, sidestepping French privacy laws and legal system. The act's wording also does not limit the Feds to serving orders for communications on US companies and entities – agents would be able to demand information from whomever they wished, if a US judge approved.

The draft law also allows foreign governments to ask for non-US-citizens' personal data stored in America, under new sharing agreements that would be worked out by the White House.

The CLOUD Act was drawn up in part as a result of the ongoing court battle between Microsoft and US law enforcement: Uncle Sam wants a Microsoft customer's email messages stored on a Microsoft-run server in Ireland. The Feds went to a judge in New York for the information, but Redmond wants prosecutors to go to Ireland and ask an Irish judge for permission.

Microsoft, essentially, is arguing that, because the data in question is stored on servers in Ireland, the g-men's request – made under the 1986 US Stored Communications Act – is invalid. The US Supreme Court will consider the case this year.

[...] "The Act also creates incentives for our foreign partners to enter into bilateral agreements that will facilitate cross-border criminal investigations, while ensuring that privacy and civil liberties are respected."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 27 2018, @03:42AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 27 2018, @03:42AM (#644446)
    Spies generally aren't considered "traitors", except during wartime. They didn't convict Julius and Ethel Rosenberg of treason, despite their selling nuclear secrets to the Soviet Union. Their actions fell under the Espionage Act. The last people formally convicted of actual treason as defined by United States Constitution include Iva "Tokyo Rose" Toguri D'Aquino and Mildred "Axis Sally" Gillars, both of whom date back to World War II (which was also the last formal war the US engaged in). Also, again except during wartime, a captured spy can be used for political advantage and such considerations can keep them from summary execution. U-2 pilot Francis Gary Powers was traded for Soviet spy Vilyam Fisher thanks to this.