Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday February 26 2018, @05:58PM   Printer-friendly
from the blooming-ridiculous dept.

Last year, Australian bureaucrats facilitated the destruction of a priceless, irreplaceable, scientific collection of plant materials on loan to their country's scientists from France. Apparently the actual destruction was carried out by an "external contractor", but that in no way absolves the bureaucracy.

Jeanson had received a message from the director of the Queensland Herbarium in Australia that was abrupt to the point of being blunt. It told him that a package of 105 botanical specimens of Australian plants owned by the Jardin des Plantes – and gathered by an intrepid French botanist more than 200 years earlier – had been destroyed by Australian biosecurity officials.

To this day, Jeanson can't quite believe what happened, and nor can scientists and museum directors from around the world who have followed the story with horror.

The specimens were both priceless and irreplaceable. How could anyone, let alone government officials, incinerate such artefacts? It was simply beyond Jeanson's comprehension. It remains so, even after post-mortems and investigations conducted in both countries, by scientists and bureaucrats, after diplomats stepped in and compensation negotiations were undertaken.

The specimens destroyed were part of the catalog of the world's plants and were a part of a base for pharmacy, agriculture, and any kind of science based on plants.

Source : 'Would you burn the Mona Lisa if it was sent?': Our horror bureaucratic bungle


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 26 2018, @07:46PM (5 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 26 2018, @07:46PM (#644127)

    They did not have a backup in tissue culture or high-resolution scans and DNA records?

  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 26 2018, @08:59PM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 26 2018, @08:59PM (#644190)

    Sounds like 2 countries fucked up royally here...

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 26 2018, @10:37PM (3 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 26 2018, @10:37PM (#644270)

      Yup, those countries sure screwed up, not having DNA analyzed and 3D scanned their 300-year-old specimens. What kind of terrible collector doesn't do that after bagging and tagging, and before putting them in storage?! Those 300-year-old botanists should be exhumed and tried for their crimes!

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 27 2018, @10:11AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 27 2018, @10:11AM (#644552)

        What kind of terrible collector doesn't do that

        The kind that ends up losing their collection.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 27 2018, @09:18PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 27 2018, @09:18PM (#644812)

        Yup, those countries sure screwed up, not having DNA analyzed and 3D scanned their 300-year-old specimens. What kind of terrible collector doesn't do that after bagging and tagging, and before putting them in storage?! Those 300-year-old botanists should be exhumed and tried for their crimes!

        I don't know maybe have a policy of performing said steps on irreplaceable items *before* they are loaned out, especially to an outside sovereignty?

      • (Score: 2) by Osamabobama on Wednesday February 28 2018, @12:10AM

        by Osamabobama (5842) on Wednesday February 28 2018, @12:10AM (#644885)

        Well, there was a war on. Then another, overlapping war...

        --
        Appended to the end of comments you post. Max: 120 chars.