Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday February 28 2018, @05:17AM   Printer-friendly
from the SPF-one-million dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

A team of astronomers led by Carnegie's Meredith MacGregor and Alycia Weinberger detected a massive stellar flare -- an energetic explosion of radiation -- from the closest star to our own Sun, Proxima Centauri, which occurred last March. This finding, published in Astrophysical Journal Letters, raises questions about the habitability of our Solar System's nearest exoplanetary neighbor, Proxima b, which orbits Proxima Centauri.

MacGregor, Weinberger and their colleagues -- the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics' David Wilner and Adam Kowalski and Steven Cranmer of the University of Colorado Boulder -- discovered the enormous flare when they reanalyzed observations taken last year by Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array, or ALMA, a radio telescope made up of 66 antennae.

At peak luminosity it was 10 times brighter than our Sun's largest flares when observed at similar wavelengths. Stellar flares have not been well studied at the wavelengths detected by ALMA, especially around stars of Proxima Centauri's type, called M dwarfs, which are the most common in our galaxy.

"March 24, 2017 was no ordinary day for Proxima Cen," said lead author MacGregor.

The flare increased Proxima Centauri's brightness by 1,000 times over 10 seconds. This was preceded by a smaller flare; taken together, the whole event lasted fewer than two minutes of the 10 hours that ALMA observed the star between January and March of last year.

[...] "It's likely that Proxima b was blasted by high energy radiation during this flare," MacGregor explained, adding that it was already known that Proxima Centauri experienced regular, although smaller, x-ray flares. "Over the billions of years since Proxima b formed, flares like this one could have evaporated any atmosphere or ocean and sterilized the surface, suggesting that habitability may involve more than just being the right distance from the host star to have liquid water."

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by seeprime on Wednesday February 28 2018, @06:15AM (2 children)

    by seeprime (5580) on Wednesday February 28 2018, @06:15AM (#644997)

    Whatever might live there, if anything does, it's bound to be quite hardy, having evolved in a system with such an energetic star. Our sun seems wimpy in comparison.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by takyon on Wednesday February 28 2018, @06:43AM

    by takyon (881) <reversethis-{gro ... s} {ta} {noykat}> on Wednesday February 28 2018, @06:43AM (#645004) Journal

    That was my first thought. However, they say:

    “Over the billions of years since Proxima b formed, flares like this one could have evaporated any atmosphere or ocean and sterilized the surface, suggesting that habitability may involve more than just being the right distance from the host star to have liquid water.”

    Really though, I wouldn't put too much stock in any of the Proxima/red dwarf habitability studies just yet, since we should be able to get better atmospheric data in a year or two using the James Webb Space Telescope.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 28 2018, @09:31AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 28 2018, @09:31AM (#645055)

    Which made me wonder. Earth has a magnetic field that protects us from much of the radiation that is send to us on daily basis. But how does this relate to the magnetic field around other planets in other star systems. Could it be that the magnetic field on Proxima b is much higher than here, still protecting the surface environment sufficiently to allow life?